1c:{"metadata":[["$","title","0",{"children":"NIH VideoCast - What Works: Evaluating NIH Programs (HHS-Only)"}],["$","meta","1",{"name":"description","content":"Administrative Strategies\n

\nWith the ever-growing emphasis on performance-based government, we need to know how to evaluate NIH investments in extramural research. What is the state of the art in conducting reliable evaluations, both quantitative and qualitative, and what methods are best applied to each evaluation problem? What assessment strategies should we incorporate at a program's inception to guide future decisions? How do we currently evaluate ongoing programs and new initiatives to determine if they accomplish what they set out to do? \n

\nThis STEP forum explores evaluation theory and practice and presents recent examples ranging from specific NIH program initiatives to the broader impacts of NIH-sponsored research.\n

\nOrganizing Committee:\n
\nChair: Peter Preusch\n
\nMembers: Lou DePaolo, John Hough, Chris Robey, Mike Sayre, and Kathleen Shino \n
\nAdvisor: Jean Noronha"}],["$","meta","2",{"name":"publisher","content":"National Institutes of Health"}],["$","meta","3",{"property":"og:title","content":"NIH VideoCast - What Works: Evaluating NIH Programs (HHS-Only)"}],["$","meta","4",{"property":"og:description","content":"Administrative Strategies\n

\nWith the ever-growing emphasis on performance-based government, we need to know how to evaluate NIH investments in extramural research. What is the state of the art in conducting reliable evaluations, both quantitative and qualitative, and what methods are best applied to each evaluation problem? What assessment strategies should we incorporate at a program's inception to guide future decisions? How do we currently evaluate ongoing programs and new initiatives to determine if they accomplish what they set out to do? \n

\nThis STEP forum explores evaluation theory and practice and presents recent examples ranging from specific NIH program initiatives to the broader impacts of NIH-sponsored research.\n

\nOrganizing Committee:\n
\nChair: Peter Preusch\n
\nMembers: Lou DePaolo, John Hough, Chris Robey, Mike Sayre, and Kathleen Shino \n
\nAdvisor: Jean Noronha"}],["$","meta","5",{"property":"og:url","content":"https://uat.d1rkikwu4q8tg.amplifyapp.com/watch/97d8c7b4-d5db-11f0-9cf9-12c45c580ad9"}],["$","meta","6",{"property":"og:site_name","content":"NIH VideoCast"}],["$","meta","7",{"property":"og:image","content":"https://nihcit.rev.vbrick.com/api/v2/media/videos/thumbnails/d7920956-624c-4320-ba8b-ccf5cec268a0.jpg"}],["$","meta","8",{"property":"og:type","content":"website"}],["$","meta","9",{"name":"twitter:card","content":"summary_large_image"}],["$","meta","10",{"name":"twitter:title","content":"NIH VideoCast - What Works: Evaluating NIH Programs (HHS-Only)"}],["$","meta","11",{"name":"twitter:description","content":"Administrative Strategies\n

\nWith the ever-growing emphasis on performance-based government, we need to know how to evaluate NIH investments in extramural research. What is the state of the art in conducting reliable evaluations, both quantitative and qualitative, and what methods are best applied to each evaluation problem? What assessment strategies should we incorporate at a program's inception to guide future decisions? How do we currently evaluate ongoing programs and new initiatives to determine if they accomplish what they set out to do? \n

\nThis STEP forum explores evaluation theory and practice and presents recent examples ranging from specific NIH program initiatives to the broader impacts of NIH-sponsored research.\n

\nOrganizing Committee:\n
\nChair: Peter Preusch\n
\nMembers: Lou DePaolo, John Hough, Chris Robey, Mike Sayre, and Kathleen Shino \n
\nAdvisor: Jean Noronha"}],"$L22","$L23","$L24"],"error":null,"digest":"$undefined"}