1c:{"metadata":[["$","title","0",{"children":"NIH VideoCast - NIH Consensus Development Conference on Vaginal Birth After Cesarean: New Insights - Day 1"}],["$","meta","1",{"name":"description","content":"For most of the 20th century, clinicians believed that once a woman had undergone a cesarean, all of her future pregnancies required delivery by that procedure as well. In the 1980s, vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) also began to be considered a viable option for these women. Since 1996, however, VBAC rates in the United States have consistently declined, while cesarean delivery rates have been steadily rising. What accounts for these changing practice patterns? Frequently cited concerns about VBAC include the possibility of uterine rupture during labor, infection, and other complications. However, repeat cesarean delivery carries risks for both mother and baby, and may impact future pregnancies. Be part of a pivotal discussion that will explore these issues. \n

\nhttp://consensus.nih.gov/2010/vbac.htm"}],["$","meta","2",{"name":"publisher","content":"National Institutes of Health"}],["$","meta","3",{"property":"og:title","content":"NIH VideoCast - NIH Consensus Development Conference on Vaginal Birth After Cesarean: New Insights - Day 1"}],["$","meta","4",{"property":"og:description","content":"For most of the 20th century, clinicians believed that once a woman had undergone a cesarean, all of her future pregnancies required delivery by that procedure as well. In the 1980s, vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) also began to be considered a viable option for these women. Since 1996, however, VBAC rates in the United States have consistently declined, while cesarean delivery rates have been steadily rising. What accounts for these changing practice patterns? Frequently cited concerns about VBAC include the possibility of uterine rupture during labor, infection, and other complications. However, repeat cesarean delivery carries risks for both mother and baby, and may impact future pregnancies. Be part of a pivotal discussion that will explore these issues. \n

\nhttp://consensus.nih.gov/2010/vbac.htm"}],["$","meta","5",{"property":"og:url","content":"https://uat.d1rkikwu4q8tg.amplifyapp.com/watch/9ef98797-d5db-11f0-9cf9-12c45c580ad9"}],["$","meta","6",{"property":"og:site_name","content":"NIH VideoCast"}],["$","meta","7",{"property":"og:image","content":"https://nihcit.rev.vbrick.com/api/v2/media/videos/thumbnails/3641fed4-a800-4bee-b816-9bb05646f6b0.jpg"}],["$","meta","8",{"property":"og:type","content":"website"}],["$","meta","9",{"name":"twitter:card","content":"summary_large_image"}],["$","meta","10",{"name":"twitter:title","content":"NIH VideoCast - NIH Consensus Development Conference on Vaginal Birth After Cesarean: New Insights - Day 1"}],["$","meta","11",{"name":"twitter:description","content":"For most of the 20th century, clinicians believed that once a woman had undergone a cesarean, all of her future pregnancies required delivery by that procedure as well. In the 1980s, vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) also began to be considered a viable option for these women. Since 1996, however, VBAC rates in the United States have consistently declined, while cesarean delivery rates have been steadily rising. What accounts for these changing practice patterns? Frequently cited concerns about VBAC include the possibility of uterine rupture during labor, infection, and other complications. However, repeat cesarean delivery carries risks for both mother and baby, and may impact future pregnancies. Be part of a pivotal discussion that will explore these issues. \n

\nhttp://consensus.nih.gov/2010/vbac.htm"}],"$L22","$L23","$L24"],"error":null,"digest":"$undefined"}