1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:03,130 TARA SCHWETZ: Thank you, everyone, for joining us today. 2 00:00:03,130 --> 00:00:04,440 I am Tara Schwetz. 3 00:00:04,440 --> 00:00:07,620 I'm the acting Principal Deputy Director of the National 4 00:00:07,620 --> 00:00:08,940 Institutes of Health. 5 00:00:08,940 --> 00:00:11,640 I'm also the co-chair of the NIH advisory committee 6 00:00:11,640 --> 00:00:14,430 to the director working group on re-envisioning 7 00:00:14,430 --> 00:00:17,100 the NIH supported postdoc. 8 00:00:17,100 --> 00:00:22,080 I'm pleased to welcome you today to our session that we have. 9 00:00:22,080 --> 00:00:24,510 And joining me, we have Dr. Shelley Berger, 10 00:00:24,510 --> 00:00:27,180 who's a professor at the University of Pennsylvania, 11 00:00:27,180 --> 00:00:31,110 who's also a co-chair of the working group along with me. 12 00:00:31,110 --> 00:00:32,549 And we have two additional members 13 00:00:32,549 --> 00:00:34,380 of the working group here-- 14 00:00:34,380 --> 00:00:36,990 Dr. Judith Kimble, professor at the University 15 00:00:36,990 --> 00:00:40,620 of Wisconsin-Madison; and Ms. Adriana Morales Gomez, 16 00:00:40,620 --> 00:00:43,530 a graduate student at Mayo Clinic. 17 00:00:43,530 --> 00:00:46,230 Now, before we jump in, I just want 18 00:00:46,230 --> 00:00:50,580 to provide a little bit of housekeeping remarks, as well 19 00:00:50,580 --> 00:00:54,240 as a little bit of an introduction into today's topic 20 00:00:54,240 --> 00:00:57,240 before turning it over to my colleague, Shelley. 21 00:00:57,240 --> 00:00:59,340 So I just want to start by saying 22 00:00:59,340 --> 00:01:01,740 that ensuring the future of US competitiveness 23 00:01:01,740 --> 00:01:03,960 in innovation and biomedical research 24 00:01:03,960 --> 00:01:07,530 is really of the utmost importance to NIH. 25 00:01:07,530 --> 00:01:10,620 Likewise, and in order to do that, we must promote 26 00:01:10,620 --> 00:01:12,540 the well-being and sustainability 27 00:01:12,540 --> 00:01:15,450 of the biomedical workforce. 28 00:01:15,450 --> 00:01:17,490 Our working group was established 29 00:01:17,490 --> 00:01:19,620 to specifically address growing concerns 30 00:01:19,620 --> 00:01:21,630 about the postdoctoral training system 31 00:01:21,630 --> 00:01:23,760 and academic research investigators' 32 00:01:23,760 --> 00:01:26,820 ability to recruit qualified postdoctoral candidates 33 00:01:26,820 --> 00:01:28,623 in the future. 34 00:01:28,623 --> 00:01:30,040 And the goal of this working group 35 00:01:30,040 --> 00:01:32,290 is going to be to explore the status 36 00:01:32,290 --> 00:01:34,960 of the postdoctoral training system, 37 00:01:34,960 --> 00:01:37,120 to identify and understand the critical factors 38 00:01:37,120 --> 00:01:38,830 and issues related to this perceived 39 00:01:38,830 --> 00:01:41,200 decline in the number of postdoctoral fellows 40 00:01:41,200 --> 00:01:41,860 in academia. 41 00:01:41,860 --> 00:01:45,040 And actually, we've seen data that really support that. 42 00:01:45,040 --> 00:01:46,900 And also to provide recommendations 43 00:01:46,900 --> 00:01:48,370 to address those factors. 44 00:01:48,370 --> 00:01:53,560 And we've been having meetings regularly 45 00:01:53,560 --> 00:01:58,000 to discuss these issues and others on this topic. 46 00:01:58,000 --> 00:01:59,620 And we really want to hear from you 47 00:01:59,620 --> 00:02:03,610 all, the biomedical research community, about these issues. 48 00:02:03,610 --> 00:02:07,160 Because your feedback and input are critical to this endeavor. 49 00:02:07,160 --> 00:02:09,520 So to set the stage today, you're 50 00:02:09,520 --> 00:02:13,060 going to be hearing from a few invited speakers. 51 00:02:13,060 --> 00:02:15,730 We will then open it up to structured discussion 52 00:02:15,730 --> 00:02:19,780 and questions from all attendees for the remainder of the hour, 53 00:02:19,780 --> 00:02:20,463 before we close. 54 00:02:20,463 --> 00:02:21,880 Now, just emphasize that we really 55 00:02:21,880 --> 00:02:25,690 want to focus on comments from all of you all. 56 00:02:25,690 --> 00:02:31,360 So we'll try to limit the amount of Q&A, 57 00:02:31,360 --> 00:02:34,150 because we really want to make sure that we are listening 58 00:02:34,150 --> 00:02:37,450 to what you all have to say. 59 00:02:37,450 --> 00:02:41,290 Now, we'll collect that input, using the QA function 60 00:02:41,290 --> 00:02:45,130 on the Zoom, which should be open now. 61 00:02:45,130 --> 00:02:48,250 So please provide your comment or a note 62 00:02:48,250 --> 00:02:51,520 on the topic of your comment, and then what we're going to do 63 00:02:51,520 --> 00:02:54,580 is we'll invite the participants to unmute and share 64 00:02:54,580 --> 00:02:56,800 their comment out loud. 65 00:02:56,800 --> 00:02:59,470 We ask that each participant limit their comments 66 00:02:59,470 --> 00:03:02,770 to about one to two minutes, so we can hear from as many 67 00:03:02,770 --> 00:03:04,790 of you as possible. 68 00:03:04,790 --> 00:03:08,390 And if you prefer to comment anonymously, we understand. 69 00:03:08,390 --> 00:03:11,360 But please note that in your comment, 70 00:03:11,360 --> 00:03:12,970 we ask you to flag that you would 71 00:03:12,970 --> 00:03:15,160 like to comment anonymously. 72 00:03:15,160 --> 00:03:18,400 And one of the facilitators will then read your note out loud, 73 00:03:18,400 --> 00:03:20,710 and there'll be no attribution. 74 00:03:20,710 --> 00:03:24,730 So please feel free again to start submitting 75 00:03:24,730 --> 00:03:28,370 your input in the Q&A box now. 76 00:03:28,370 --> 00:03:30,460 So now I want to turn it over to Shelley 77 00:03:30,460 --> 00:03:33,520 to frame today's topic, which is on the role, duration 78 00:03:33,520 --> 00:03:36,580 structure, and value of the academic postdoc, 79 00:03:36,580 --> 00:03:39,190 and importantly this includes the impacts 80 00:03:39,190 --> 00:03:41,480 on underrepresented populations. 81 00:03:41,480 --> 00:03:42,115 So Shelley? 82 00:03:45,610 --> 00:03:46,870 SHELLEY BERGER: Yes. 83 00:03:46,870 --> 00:03:47,620 Great. 84 00:03:47,620 --> 00:03:48,685 Thank you, Tara. 85 00:03:52,920 --> 00:03:55,830 I'm really happy to be here and to greet everyone. 86 00:03:55,830 --> 00:03:58,080 We've got nearly 400 people online. 87 00:03:58,080 --> 00:04:01,350 So that's fantastic. 88 00:04:01,350 --> 00:04:08,370 Here we present one view of the role of postdocs 89 00:04:08,370 --> 00:04:11,610 in academic science, the postdocs 90 00:04:11,610 --> 00:04:15,810 do work with principal investigators in their labs. 91 00:04:15,810 --> 00:04:22,950 And the sharing of running a lab and working together 92 00:04:22,950 --> 00:04:24,810 varies from lab to lab. 93 00:04:24,810 --> 00:04:29,430 But one view is that postdocs work as, this 94 00:04:29,430 --> 00:04:32,760 is a metaphor, as worker bees. 95 00:04:32,760 --> 00:04:37,830 And historically, postdocs will go on 96 00:04:37,830 --> 00:04:42,900 to become principal investigators themselves, 97 00:04:42,900 --> 00:04:46,320 as in this view from Paula Stephan, 98 00:04:46,320 --> 00:04:51,330 making this metaphor about the role of postdocs. 99 00:04:51,330 --> 00:04:55,410 We certainly view this as one of the key topics 100 00:04:55,410 --> 00:04:58,110 of what we want to talk about today, 101 00:04:58,110 --> 00:05:01,380 the experience of postdocs in labs, 102 00:05:01,380 --> 00:05:04,620 and how that's been evolving, how it's shaping, 103 00:05:04,620 --> 00:05:08,820 how postdocs view themselves within labs. 104 00:05:08,820 --> 00:05:11,130 So, going on to the next slide. 105 00:05:17,500 --> 00:05:23,220 So here, using recent data from the National Science Foundation 106 00:05:23,220 --> 00:05:26,700 from 2021, we're showing here the number 107 00:05:26,700 --> 00:05:30,600 of US postdocs represented by the solid blue line, 108 00:05:30,600 --> 00:05:33,900 and the number of non-faculty researchers 109 00:05:33,900 --> 00:05:37,960 with doctorates in the dotted teal line. 110 00:05:37,960 --> 00:05:42,360 So the non-faculty researchers are doctorate holding staff 111 00:05:42,360 --> 00:05:47,350 who are neither postdocs nor are they faculty. 112 00:05:47,350 --> 00:05:53,150 But they spend their time primarily involved in research. 113 00:05:53,150 --> 00:05:56,410 So the key thing here is that the number of postdocs 114 00:05:56,410 --> 00:06:03,580 have steadily increased over time since 1980. 115 00:06:03,580 --> 00:06:08,830 And really, you can see as was pretty flat in the middle part 116 00:06:08,830 --> 00:06:09,790 of this graph. 117 00:06:09,790 --> 00:06:13,120 And then has really leveled off. 118 00:06:13,120 --> 00:06:18,930 And in fact, has even begun to decline after 2020. 119 00:06:18,930 --> 00:06:22,170 So in the next slide, as one indication 120 00:06:22,170 --> 00:06:26,710 of what's been going on, we're showing here 121 00:06:26,710 --> 00:06:30,390 the number of applications, awards, and success rates 122 00:06:30,390 --> 00:06:39,270 for National Institute of Health, NRSA F32 fellowships, 123 00:06:39,270 --> 00:06:43,860 which is NIH's individual postdoc fellowship mechanism. 124 00:06:43,860 --> 00:06:48,660 And I think it's quite apparent that applications and awards 125 00:06:48,660 --> 00:06:52,050 have been decreasing in recent years, 126 00:06:52,050 --> 00:06:57,570 despite a very constant success rate. 127 00:06:57,570 --> 00:06:59,530 So that's quite interesting. 128 00:06:59,530 --> 00:07:03,180 So together, these data support, really I 129 00:07:03,180 --> 00:07:05,160 think illustrate the idea that there's 130 00:07:05,160 --> 00:07:11,100 been a decline of postdocs, and really illustrates the urgency 131 00:07:11,100 --> 00:07:14,410 to address these issues. 132 00:07:14,410 --> 00:07:22,090 OK, so in this next slide, we're depicting the many forces that 133 00:07:22,090 --> 00:07:26,290 are really driving the decline. 134 00:07:26,290 --> 00:07:32,650 And here we include the limited opportunities in academia, 135 00:07:32,650 --> 00:07:35,230 so postdocs going back to this idea 136 00:07:35,230 --> 00:07:40,180 that postdocs will eventually become PIs, 137 00:07:40,180 --> 00:07:42,550 the opportunities have become more limited. 138 00:07:42,550 --> 00:07:45,640 And on contrast, there have become new opportunities 139 00:07:45,640 --> 00:07:48,070 in pharma, in biotech. 140 00:07:48,070 --> 00:07:50,710 In addition, we've seen a lengthening time. 141 00:07:50,710 --> 00:07:53,350 I think most of us have seen this lengthening time 142 00:07:53,350 --> 00:07:58,630 to publish, and the expectations for research 143 00:07:58,630 --> 00:08:00,250 really have been expanding. 144 00:08:00,250 --> 00:08:04,060 And finally, I think starting with coronavirus virus 145 00:08:04,060 --> 00:08:08,990 really driving this and making it quite obvious, 146 00:08:08,990 --> 00:08:11,200 we've seen an increasing expectation 147 00:08:11,200 --> 00:08:14,380 for work-life balance and the cost of living 148 00:08:14,380 --> 00:08:17,450 continuing to increase. 149 00:08:17,450 --> 00:08:20,290 So on the topic of the duration of postdocs, 150 00:08:20,290 --> 00:08:22,930 data from the National postdoc association 151 00:08:22,930 --> 00:08:25,990 indicates that 89% of institutions 152 00:08:25,990 --> 00:08:28,090 have a term limit on postdocs. 153 00:08:28,090 --> 00:08:32,500 And the limit for most of these institutions is five years. 154 00:08:32,500 --> 00:08:34,600 It's critical for this working group 155 00:08:34,600 --> 00:08:38,169 to carefully consider the experiences of the community 156 00:08:38,169 --> 00:08:41,530 surrounding the role, duration structure, and value 157 00:08:41,530 --> 00:08:44,020 of postdocs, and how that impacts 158 00:08:44,020 --> 00:08:45,880 underrepresented populations. 159 00:08:45,880 --> 00:08:48,460 And we're extremely pleased to have 160 00:08:48,460 --> 00:08:52,468 all of you here to share your input on these matters today. 161 00:08:52,468 --> 00:08:54,010 And with that, I'm going to hand back 162 00:08:54,010 --> 00:08:56,590 to Tara to introduce our speakers before we 163 00:08:56,590 --> 00:08:58,690 move on to your comments. 164 00:09:02,647 --> 00:09:03,480 TARA SCHWETZ: Great. 165 00:09:03,480 --> 00:09:05,700 Thanks so much, Shelley. 166 00:09:05,700 --> 00:09:09,780 So I am delighted that we have with us here today 167 00:09:09,780 --> 00:09:14,520 three folks who were invited to share their perspectives. 168 00:09:14,520 --> 00:09:18,570 We'll start with Dr. Esra Yalcin, who is a fifth year 169 00:09:18,570 --> 00:09:21,930 postdoc from Harvard Medical School, Boston Children's 170 00:09:21,930 --> 00:09:22,770 Hospital. 171 00:09:22,770 --> 00:09:25,590 She's the current president of the Boston Postdoctoral 172 00:09:25,590 --> 00:09:29,070 Association and leading author of "Retaining Postdocs 173 00:09:29,070 --> 00:09:31,530 by Recognizing their Worth," which 174 00:09:31,530 --> 00:09:35,430 was published in Nature Biotechnology in February 175 00:09:35,430 --> 00:09:36,630 of 2022. 176 00:09:36,630 --> 00:09:40,695 So with that, Esra, I'll turn it over to you. 177 00:09:40,695 --> 00:09:42,820 ESRA YALCIN: Thank you, Tara, for the introduction. 178 00:09:42,820 --> 00:09:45,820 And thank you for the working group for inviting me today 179 00:09:45,820 --> 00:09:46,960 to speak. 180 00:09:46,960 --> 00:09:50,770 I'll briefly mention about three challenges as postdocs we face, 181 00:09:50,770 --> 00:09:54,665 and most of these challenges are affecting 182 00:09:54,665 --> 00:09:57,040 the underrepresented minorities in our postdoc community. 183 00:09:57,040 --> 00:09:58,832 And I'm going to share my perspective based 184 00:09:58,832 --> 00:10:01,720 on my interaction past four years 185 00:10:01,720 --> 00:10:03,970 with the postdoc communities in Boston area, 186 00:10:03,970 --> 00:10:07,540 as well as my own being postdoc in Harvard Medical School, 187 00:10:07,540 --> 00:10:08,710 Boston Children's Hospital. 188 00:10:08,710 --> 00:10:11,500 So my first identified challenge is 189 00:10:11,500 --> 00:10:14,770 as a postdoc, that is I believe driving 190 00:10:14,770 --> 00:10:17,680 the decline in the participation in academia, 191 00:10:17,680 --> 00:10:19,765 is not getting paid well enough. 192 00:10:19,765 --> 00:10:22,090 The second one is being a postdoc parent, 193 00:10:22,090 --> 00:10:24,910 in especially high-cost living areas like Boston. 194 00:10:24,910 --> 00:10:27,700 And third one is lack of bullying and harassment 195 00:10:27,700 --> 00:10:31,313 policies, as well as clarities on them. 196 00:10:31,313 --> 00:10:32,980 And we're not getting paid, I'll briefly 197 00:10:32,980 --> 00:10:36,160 say how it impacts underrepresented population 198 00:10:36,160 --> 00:10:39,130 in postdocs, and what are my three solutions, so 199 00:10:39,130 --> 00:10:40,690 one solution to each problem. 200 00:10:44,350 --> 00:10:47,710 When we're not getting paid well enough in Massachusetts, 201 00:10:47,710 --> 00:10:52,300 I mean we know that there is a set NIH pay scale, that's 202 00:10:52,300 --> 00:10:54,880 that starts with $53,000. 203 00:10:54,880 --> 00:10:56,620 The low income level in Massachusetts 204 00:10:56,620 --> 00:11:01,840 is $60,000, which means that for us, for folks holding PhD 205 00:11:01,840 --> 00:11:05,650 degrees, to be able to not eligible for a social housing 206 00:11:05,650 --> 00:11:07,990 in Massachusetts, we have to work a couple more 207 00:11:07,990 --> 00:11:09,640 years into our postdocs. 208 00:11:09,640 --> 00:11:14,050 And that ultimately affects people 209 00:11:14,050 --> 00:11:16,330 of color, people of low income families, 210 00:11:16,330 --> 00:11:18,910 because we no longer afford to live in a high-cost living 211 00:11:18,910 --> 00:11:22,180 area that is also a hub center for science. 212 00:11:22,180 --> 00:11:25,750 And it makes us feel like we're not valued enough, 213 00:11:25,750 --> 00:11:27,430 our effort is not valued enough. 214 00:11:27,430 --> 00:11:29,920 And the solution to that is regional cost 215 00:11:29,920 --> 00:11:32,050 of living adjustment that has been proposed 216 00:11:32,050 --> 00:11:34,150 by several publications, including 217 00:11:34,150 --> 00:11:36,940 me and my team's last publication in Nature 218 00:11:36,940 --> 00:11:38,590 Biotechnology. 219 00:11:38,590 --> 00:11:40,600 The second challenge is being a postdoc parent. 220 00:11:40,600 --> 00:11:42,880 It mostly affects the female parents, 221 00:11:42,880 --> 00:11:45,460 because the data shows the gender gap appears 222 00:11:45,460 --> 00:11:49,090 after the birth of our child, because mothers 223 00:11:49,090 --> 00:11:53,470 are preparing to take care to cover the 40% of child care 224 00:11:53,470 --> 00:11:59,080 costs in Boston, because it's no longer available, as working 225 00:11:59,080 --> 00:12:02,110 two academic postdocs in academia. 226 00:12:02,110 --> 00:12:08,170 And then eventually, it impacts basically the females mostly, 227 00:12:08,170 --> 00:12:10,840 and then it causes them to leave academia. 228 00:12:10,840 --> 00:12:15,040 And my solution to that is to increase the parental leave. 229 00:12:15,040 --> 00:12:17,863 In some institutions, we know that there are 8 to 12 weeks 230 00:12:17,863 --> 00:12:19,030 parental leave they provide. 231 00:12:19,030 --> 00:12:22,090 But I offer, based on my data collection 232 00:12:22,090 --> 00:12:23,465 from our communities. 233 00:12:23,465 --> 00:12:27,040 16 weeks of paternity or maternity leave individually. 234 00:12:27,040 --> 00:12:30,940 And then Cornell University had a practice they were offering. 235 00:12:30,940 --> 00:12:34,300 In their program, they were offering $50,000 236 00:12:34,300 --> 00:12:37,600 to the newly parents, to hire a lab tech assistant. 237 00:12:37,600 --> 00:12:39,890 I know this applies only at lab. 238 00:12:39,890 --> 00:12:42,430 But basically, that lab technician 239 00:12:42,430 --> 00:12:45,100 would help continue the research, 240 00:12:45,100 --> 00:12:48,040 while the parent is taking care of the newly born baby. 241 00:12:48,040 --> 00:12:49,630 But I think that can set an example, 242 00:12:49,630 --> 00:12:52,180 and then I hope that would open other venues 243 00:12:52,180 --> 00:12:55,630 for potential solution to this postdoc parent problem. 244 00:12:55,630 --> 00:12:57,880 And then third one is lack of bullying and harassment, 245 00:12:57,880 --> 00:13:00,070 as I mentioned. 246 00:13:00,070 --> 00:13:02,890 Again, people of color, people of different sexual 247 00:13:02,890 --> 00:13:05,260 orientation, people of religion, people 248 00:13:05,260 --> 00:13:08,230 of different gender, and mostly women, are affected by that. 249 00:13:08,230 --> 00:13:12,340 We have enough data to show that I believe. 250 00:13:12,340 --> 00:13:17,800 As a solution, when I go to a facility every day, 251 00:13:17,800 --> 00:13:20,440 I see NIH returning, and that person 252 00:13:20,440 --> 00:13:23,200 is an independent inspector and reporter. 253 00:13:23,200 --> 00:13:25,960 And whenever there is a small violation is being detected 254 00:13:25,960 --> 00:13:29,170 immediately, and then any ethical violation, 255 00:13:29,170 --> 00:13:32,170 and it's been reported to NIH, and I know how seriously we 256 00:13:32,170 --> 00:13:37,390 are taking this practice, my solution 257 00:13:37,390 --> 00:13:40,330 is that I think we have efficient reporting 258 00:13:40,330 --> 00:13:42,170 and inspection systems in place. 259 00:13:42,170 --> 00:13:45,730 But I am afraid those systems are not applying 260 00:13:45,730 --> 00:13:47,500 to postdocs human beings yet. 261 00:13:47,500 --> 00:13:51,610 And I hope NIH can create environments 262 00:13:51,610 --> 00:13:55,570 that we can more freely and openly report these cases, 263 00:13:55,570 --> 00:13:58,330 and advocate for ourselves. 264 00:13:58,330 --> 00:14:00,320 Again, thank you for providing me this space, 265 00:14:00,320 --> 00:14:01,780 to speak for our postdocs today. 266 00:14:06,340 --> 00:14:08,760 TARA SCHWETZ: Thank you so much for those comments 267 00:14:08,760 --> 00:14:10,530 and that feedback. 268 00:14:10,530 --> 00:14:13,770 Next, I'm going to turn it over to Dr. Bruce Mandt, who 269 00:14:13,770 --> 00:14:15,930 serves as the Associate Dean for Career 270 00:14:15,930 --> 00:14:18,600 and Professional development in the graduate school 271 00:14:18,600 --> 00:14:21,000 and director of the post-doctoral office 272 00:14:21,000 --> 00:14:25,740 at the University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus. 273 00:14:25,740 --> 00:14:28,470 Bruce is currently chair of the Association 274 00:14:28,470 --> 00:14:31,990 of American Medical Colleges' group on research, education, 275 00:14:31,990 --> 00:14:33,340 and training. 276 00:14:33,340 --> 00:14:36,030 This is their postdoctoral training section. 277 00:14:36,030 --> 00:14:38,932 With that, I'll turn it over to Bruce. 278 00:14:38,932 --> 00:14:39,890 BRUCE MANDT: Thank you. 279 00:14:39,890 --> 00:14:42,770 Thank you for the opportunity to engage in this conversation, 280 00:14:42,770 --> 00:14:44,870 and for the NIH's efforts to address challenges 281 00:14:44,870 --> 00:14:47,470 within our postdoctoral communities. 282 00:14:47,470 --> 00:14:50,150 I've chosen to focus on three primary challenges. 283 00:14:50,150 --> 00:14:52,050 One, finances. 284 00:14:52,050 --> 00:14:54,050 This likely will be a main point of conversation 285 00:14:54,050 --> 00:14:56,630 and also the most difficult item to address. 286 00:14:56,630 --> 00:14:59,240 Regardless, the financial burden posed to many postdocs 287 00:14:59,240 --> 00:15:02,060 has made continuing in this position prohibitive. 288 00:15:02,060 --> 00:15:04,040 Two, mentorship. 289 00:15:04,040 --> 00:15:05,630 Unlike graduate programs, there's 290 00:15:05,630 --> 00:15:08,060 little oversight for postdoctoral mentoring outside 291 00:15:08,060 --> 00:15:09,800 of T32 programs. 292 00:15:09,800 --> 00:15:11,570 Far too frequently, postdocs are still 293 00:15:11,570 --> 00:15:14,840 seen as a cost effective means to complete research projects, 294 00:15:14,840 --> 00:15:18,500 and not as an investment in the future of biomedical research. 295 00:15:18,500 --> 00:15:20,163 And three, uncertainty. 296 00:15:20,163 --> 00:15:22,580 I believe one final challenge is the uncertainty about how 297 00:15:22,580 --> 00:15:24,350 postdoc training is moving someone forward 298 00:15:24,350 --> 00:15:25,520 in their careers. 299 00:15:25,520 --> 00:15:27,950 But I would set expectations around length of training, 300 00:15:27,950 --> 00:15:30,710 a training will occur, and clear career outcomes. 301 00:15:30,710 --> 00:15:33,020 Postdocs are asked to enter into a nebulous void 302 00:15:33,020 --> 00:15:35,330 of an uncertain future that in practice may 303 00:15:35,330 --> 00:15:37,220 last upwards of 10 years. 304 00:15:37,220 --> 00:15:39,350 Consequently, the value of the postdoc 305 00:15:39,350 --> 00:15:43,100 is unclear, and can appear largely undesirable. 306 00:15:43,100 --> 00:15:45,740 Some points for consideration, the current state 307 00:15:45,740 --> 00:15:47,300 of postdoc training selects not only 308 00:15:47,300 --> 00:15:49,820 based on interest and ability, but also 309 00:15:49,820 --> 00:15:51,500 based on who has independent means 310 00:15:51,500 --> 00:15:53,570 to continue in these positions. 311 00:15:53,570 --> 00:15:55,130 The selection criteria frequently 312 00:15:55,130 --> 00:15:56,750 advantages those who already benefit 313 00:15:56,750 --> 00:15:58,250 from different forms of privilege, 314 00:15:58,250 --> 00:16:00,110 and undermines our ability to build greater 315 00:16:00,110 --> 00:16:02,780 representation in science. 316 00:16:02,780 --> 00:16:04,190 By setting different expectations 317 00:16:04,190 --> 00:16:07,970 for postdoc training based on NRSA or non-NRSA support, 318 00:16:07,970 --> 00:16:10,760 the NIH currently establishes different classes of postdocs, 319 00:16:10,760 --> 00:16:14,090 and cements institutional inequities. 320 00:16:14,090 --> 00:16:16,100 The vast majority of biomedical institutions 321 00:16:16,100 --> 00:16:18,920 use the NRSA rates to set their pay policies. 322 00:16:18,920 --> 00:16:22,190 Because of this, NRSA rates have tremendous power 323 00:16:22,190 --> 00:16:25,640 to affect the overall pay that both sides receive. 324 00:16:25,640 --> 00:16:28,070 Given that the NIH supports the overwhelming majority 325 00:16:28,070 --> 00:16:31,850 of postdocs on non-NSRA grants, augmenting expectations 326 00:16:31,850 --> 00:16:34,040 for postdoc training on research grants 327 00:16:34,040 --> 00:16:37,500 will have the greatest impact on postdoc training. 328 00:16:37,500 --> 00:16:39,410 Finally, our international postdocs 329 00:16:39,410 --> 00:16:42,868 are primarily supported on research grants, and as such, 330 00:16:42,868 --> 00:16:44,660 do not benefit from the structured training 331 00:16:44,660 --> 00:16:48,230 and focus on career development that NRSAs provide. 332 00:16:48,230 --> 00:16:51,170 I also want to offer these potential solutions. 333 00:16:51,170 --> 00:16:53,690 For finances, set regionally adjusted cost 334 00:16:53,690 --> 00:16:55,280 of living NSRA rates. 335 00:16:55,280 --> 00:16:58,190 And clarify NRSA language to allow institutions 336 00:16:58,190 --> 00:17:01,070 to provide equitable benefits to all postdocs, 337 00:17:01,070 --> 00:17:03,400 regardless of funding source. 338 00:17:03,400 --> 00:17:06,790 Two, set consistent postdoc training expectations, 339 00:17:06,790 --> 00:17:08,650 regardless of funding source. 340 00:17:08,650 --> 00:17:10,900 Before approving a postdoc's appointment to a research 341 00:17:10,900 --> 00:17:12,940 grant, require the postdoc and PI 342 00:17:12,940 --> 00:17:15,460 to submit some form of a career and training plan, 343 00:17:15,460 --> 00:17:17,710 potentially even uploading it to ERA commons 344 00:17:17,710 --> 00:17:20,020 and require annual updates. 345 00:17:20,020 --> 00:17:23,319 Require evidence of commitment to mentoring from all faculty 346 00:17:23,319 --> 00:17:25,400 who want to support a postdoc. 347 00:17:25,400 --> 00:17:28,580 Set consistent salary stipend amounts for all postdocs 348 00:17:28,580 --> 00:17:31,400 and require following experience levels. 349 00:17:31,400 --> 00:17:33,890 And place absolute limits on total time allowable 350 00:17:33,890 --> 00:17:36,940 for support in postdoctoral positions. 351 00:17:36,940 --> 00:17:40,030 Three, use successful models like the RACDA 352 00:17:40,030 --> 00:17:42,250 to focus on additional career options. 353 00:17:42,250 --> 00:17:44,950 For example, pathways to industry, which could help 354 00:17:44,950 --> 00:17:46,540 build public-private partnerships. 355 00:17:46,540 --> 00:17:49,090 And allow postdocs to gain industry experience while still 356 00:17:49,090 --> 00:17:51,490 focusing on academic research. 357 00:17:51,490 --> 00:17:54,940 And four, finally, create more early career awards 358 00:17:54,940 --> 00:17:56,860 for non-tenured track faculty roles, 359 00:17:56,860 --> 00:17:58,720 so individuals can amass accomplishments 360 00:17:58,720 --> 00:18:02,260 in independent positions, rather than remaining as postdocs 361 00:18:02,260 --> 00:18:04,460 longer than necessary. 362 00:18:04,460 --> 00:18:05,710 Thank you for the opportunity. 363 00:18:09,875 --> 00:18:12,000 TARA SCHWETZ: Thank you, Bruce, for those comments. 364 00:18:12,000 --> 00:18:17,160 And our last commenter today is Dr. Antentor Hinton, 365 00:18:17,160 --> 00:18:19,920 who's an assistant professor of molecular physiology 366 00:18:19,920 --> 00:18:22,770 and biophysics at Vanderbilt University. 367 00:18:22,770 --> 00:18:26,640 He has also published papers on revitalizing and reimagining 368 00:18:26,640 --> 00:18:29,340 the STEM pipeline, mentoring minority trainees, 369 00:18:29,340 --> 00:18:31,140 and applying for faculty jobs. 370 00:18:31,140 --> 00:18:33,855 I'll turn it over to you. 371 00:18:33,855 --> 00:18:35,980 ANTENTOR HINTON: Thank you very much for having me. 372 00:18:35,980 --> 00:18:38,020 The first thing I want to say is thank you 373 00:18:38,020 --> 00:18:40,730 for allowing me to have this space to speak. 374 00:18:40,730 --> 00:18:42,260 So I just want to get right into it. 375 00:18:42,260 --> 00:18:43,760 So the very first thing that I think 376 00:18:43,760 --> 00:18:47,260 that is critical for postdocs to see is mentoring. 377 00:18:47,260 --> 00:18:50,830 There are not a lot of engagement around the practice 378 00:18:50,830 --> 00:18:52,300 of mentoring. 379 00:18:52,300 --> 00:18:56,090 We have now started to, as a scientific culture if you will, 380 00:18:56,090 --> 00:18:58,660 to acquire the IDP plan. 381 00:18:58,660 --> 00:19:01,150 But we should need to go a little bit further. 382 00:19:01,150 --> 00:19:02,560 I agree with what Bruce is saying 383 00:19:02,560 --> 00:19:04,120 in the context of actually uploading 384 00:19:04,120 --> 00:19:06,760 the IDP plan as part of the progress report at least 385 00:19:06,760 --> 00:19:07,960 per year. 386 00:19:07,960 --> 00:19:12,220 But the actual case of how an IDP plan works 387 00:19:12,220 --> 00:19:14,330 is usually it's updated every three to six months. 388 00:19:14,330 --> 00:19:16,840 So really there should be a twice a year 389 00:19:16,840 --> 00:19:20,320 requirement for mentors and the trainee to be able to say, OK, 390 00:19:20,320 --> 00:19:21,820 this is the progress that we've done 391 00:19:21,820 --> 00:19:24,140 in the mentoring and the career development space. 392 00:19:24,140 --> 00:19:26,380 And then here's the research progress. 393 00:19:26,380 --> 00:19:29,020 And these things would be needed to be evaluated equally 394 00:19:29,020 --> 00:19:31,900 in order for them to acquire the funding for the next year. 395 00:19:31,900 --> 00:19:34,300 Then in the context of mentoring, 396 00:19:34,300 --> 00:19:36,460 there's not enough framework in the context 397 00:19:36,460 --> 00:19:38,140 of the different types of mentoring. 398 00:19:38,140 --> 00:19:40,690 Because I think a lot of times, postdocs 399 00:19:40,690 --> 00:19:45,370 think that their PI can be all of the types of mentors 400 00:19:45,370 --> 00:19:46,240 that they need. 401 00:19:46,240 --> 00:19:48,670 And actually most of the time, we need a myriad of mentors 402 00:19:48,670 --> 00:19:50,750 to be able to accomplish the goals that we need. 403 00:19:50,750 --> 00:19:53,770 And so actually setting guidelines around and making 404 00:19:53,770 --> 00:19:57,155 institutions have mentoring committees for postdocs 405 00:19:57,155 --> 00:19:58,780 would allow for them to be able to have 406 00:19:58,780 --> 00:20:01,430 greater access to other training opportunities. 407 00:20:01,430 --> 00:20:03,700 And so that is part of that whole mentoring piece 408 00:20:03,700 --> 00:20:05,520 that we need to explore more. 409 00:20:05,520 --> 00:20:06,940 And one last thing about mentoring 410 00:20:06,940 --> 00:20:10,300 is that we also need to think about mentoring contracts, as 411 00:20:10,300 --> 00:20:13,360 well as understanding other tools, like acquiring mentoring 412 00:20:13,360 --> 00:20:15,790 tools to accomplish their network on social media 413 00:20:15,790 --> 00:20:18,580 and networking, as well as understanding who they are, 414 00:20:18,580 --> 00:20:21,245 and how that integrates into their science. 415 00:20:21,245 --> 00:20:22,870 The second point that I wanted to raise 416 00:20:22,870 --> 00:20:26,210 is around how we think about funding. 417 00:20:26,210 --> 00:20:28,623 So there's been a lot of great ideas about funding. 418 00:20:28,623 --> 00:20:30,790 But one of the things that I really want to focus on 419 00:20:30,790 --> 00:20:34,420 is that let's say a postdoc has maxed out the five years. 420 00:20:34,420 --> 00:20:36,700 But they need one more year to get 421 00:20:36,700 --> 00:20:40,690 that CNS paper or a top-tier paper in their society. 422 00:20:40,690 --> 00:20:43,210 That means that there needs to be an alternative route, 423 00:20:43,210 --> 00:20:47,350 or there needs to be a change in association with postdoc title. 424 00:20:47,350 --> 00:20:49,180 A lot of the times in academia we're 425 00:20:49,180 --> 00:20:52,630 actually aware of that instructor, or associate, 426 00:20:52,630 --> 00:20:57,160 or staff scientist, technically some of the older generation 427 00:20:57,160 --> 00:20:59,680 calls it like a super or a senior postdoc. 428 00:20:59,680 --> 00:21:02,440 And so even though it's an entry-level junior faculty 429 00:21:02,440 --> 00:21:04,120 position, these things should still 430 00:21:04,120 --> 00:21:06,580 be associated with postdoc, but a degree 431 00:21:06,580 --> 00:21:10,360 beyond where they're the five year training plan 432 00:21:10,360 --> 00:21:11,290 meets for a postdoc. 433 00:21:11,290 --> 00:21:12,998 It's just a different title, so that they 434 00:21:12,998 --> 00:21:14,120 can stay in the system. 435 00:21:14,120 --> 00:21:17,530 So if the NIH actually adjusts what they're calling postdocs, 436 00:21:17,530 --> 00:21:19,660 when you have a difference in first five years, 437 00:21:19,660 --> 00:21:23,110 and then a second phase, and support a specific K 438 00:21:23,110 --> 00:21:25,540 for that phase, so that they can either 439 00:21:25,540 --> 00:21:27,550 transition into a faculty position, 440 00:21:27,550 --> 00:21:32,440 or transition out into another type of job. 441 00:21:32,440 --> 00:21:35,320 And that still would be along with the training plan, 442 00:21:35,320 --> 00:21:36,910 because a lot of these positions that 443 00:21:36,910 --> 00:21:38,920 don't make it to directly the academia, going 444 00:21:38,920 --> 00:21:41,560 to teaching or other impressive roles 445 00:21:41,560 --> 00:21:43,100 within the scientific community. 446 00:21:43,100 --> 00:21:44,590 So those needs could be recorded. 447 00:21:44,590 --> 00:21:48,040 And that also is a trap for a lot of minority candidates, 448 00:21:48,040 --> 00:21:49,888 because at the time of five years, 449 00:21:49,888 --> 00:21:51,430 there's a critical junction that they 450 00:21:51,430 --> 00:21:53,260 may have other responsibilities not only 451 00:21:53,260 --> 00:21:55,083 within their own family structure, 452 00:21:55,083 --> 00:21:56,500 but also the larger scheme of when 453 00:21:56,500 --> 00:22:00,290 they're taking care of parents and other close relatives. 454 00:22:00,290 --> 00:22:02,590 So we have to be accommodating for that as well 455 00:22:02,590 --> 00:22:03,880 as the sliding scale. 456 00:22:03,880 --> 00:22:06,730 A lot of people don't know that the minimum is not 457 00:22:06,730 --> 00:22:08,980 the "maximum" quote-unquote that is set online. 458 00:22:08,980 --> 00:22:10,090 It's really the minimum. 459 00:22:10,090 --> 00:22:12,072 And so that also needs to be clear. 460 00:22:12,072 --> 00:22:14,530 Because this is some of the negotiation that could actually 461 00:22:14,530 --> 00:22:19,690 happen within the mentoring plan that, based upon these things, 462 00:22:19,690 --> 00:22:21,430 your salary could increase. 463 00:22:21,430 --> 00:22:24,350 With that, relocation fees are very important. 464 00:22:24,350 --> 00:22:26,410 There's a lot of minority candidates 465 00:22:26,410 --> 00:22:31,360 and I'm speaking as one that needed relocation costs as well 466 00:22:31,360 --> 00:22:33,460 as a signing bonus, to be able to move and do 467 00:22:33,460 --> 00:22:36,850 the things in that space, because I didn't have time 468 00:22:36,850 --> 00:22:38,710 to work on those personal things. 469 00:22:38,710 --> 00:22:40,510 I was more working on my degree at the time 470 00:22:40,510 --> 00:22:41,980 when I was getting my PhD. 471 00:22:41,980 --> 00:22:44,620 So this is a critical moment that could really 472 00:22:44,620 --> 00:22:46,960 make a difference in how we see postdocs, 473 00:22:46,960 --> 00:22:49,960 and give them the boost that they need to be productive, 474 00:22:49,960 --> 00:22:51,910 excited about the science. 475 00:22:51,910 --> 00:22:54,130 Because the other financial commitment has been taken 476 00:22:54,130 --> 00:22:54,977 care of. 477 00:22:54,977 --> 00:22:57,310 And then the very last thing that I wanted to talk about 478 00:22:57,310 --> 00:22:59,260 is resources in the postdoc. 479 00:22:59,260 --> 00:23:01,480 There should be a set training plan. 480 00:23:01,480 --> 00:23:04,060 So we have phases of NMRA and SIMRA 481 00:23:04,060 --> 00:23:06,310 out there that talk about culturally aware mentorship. 482 00:23:06,310 --> 00:23:09,970 But there's not a package around the professional and career 483 00:23:09,970 --> 00:23:12,530 development skills that are needed for them to transition. 484 00:23:12,530 --> 00:23:14,020 So a lot of times when I'm writing 485 00:23:14,020 --> 00:23:16,120 these particular articles that were mentioned, 486 00:23:16,120 --> 00:23:18,370 they are talking about the skill sets 487 00:23:18,370 --> 00:23:20,440 that postdocs need or graduate students need 488 00:23:20,440 --> 00:23:22,150 to advance to the next stage. 489 00:23:22,150 --> 00:23:25,180 Postdocs are not aware of the negotiation process. 490 00:23:25,180 --> 00:23:29,270 They're not aware of what can be asked and what should be asked. 491 00:23:29,270 --> 00:23:31,240 So a lot of these conversations would only 492 00:23:31,240 --> 00:23:32,600 have to happen with the PI. 493 00:23:32,600 --> 00:23:35,182 So we have to be a aware of those particular conversations 494 00:23:35,182 --> 00:23:37,640 and adjust so that they have the information that they need 495 00:23:37,640 --> 00:23:40,130 to make the most pivotal decision that's going to be 496 00:23:40,130 --> 00:23:41,600 the next stage in their career. 497 00:23:41,600 --> 00:23:43,490 And also training for that position, 498 00:23:43,490 --> 00:23:45,110 as in the context of business. 499 00:23:45,110 --> 00:23:47,870 So I really feel that the NIH should be more required 500 00:23:47,870 --> 00:23:50,900 and this is my last thought because I'm a little over, 501 00:23:50,900 --> 00:23:53,330 that the NIH really needs to think 502 00:23:53,330 --> 00:23:56,480 about in the context of how do they do business management 503 00:23:56,480 --> 00:23:59,360 or laboratory management skills for the postdoc, 504 00:23:59,360 --> 00:24:01,610 so that they're successful at the next training stage. 505 00:24:01,610 --> 00:24:05,815 Because a lot of them will phase out of the stage of helping, 506 00:24:05,815 --> 00:24:07,190 because there's not a requirement 507 00:24:07,190 --> 00:24:09,890 for mentoring committees at the faculty stage. 508 00:24:09,890 --> 00:24:11,600 So that's all I have to say for now. 509 00:24:11,600 --> 00:24:14,630 Thank you. 510 00:24:14,630 --> 00:24:17,180 TARA SCHWETZ: Thank you so much. 511 00:24:17,180 --> 00:24:20,960 So now, I'm going to open the floor 512 00:24:20,960 --> 00:24:24,230 to your comments and questions, those folks who 513 00:24:24,230 --> 00:24:26,430 are in attendance. 514 00:24:26,430 --> 00:24:28,490 And as noted at the beginning of the meeting, 515 00:24:28,490 --> 00:24:30,930 please share your input using the QA function. 516 00:24:30,930 --> 00:24:34,130 We've already got a number of different comments 517 00:24:34,130 --> 00:24:35,990 and questions coming through. 518 00:24:35,990 --> 00:24:41,690 You may provide your comment directly, or the general topic 519 00:24:41,690 --> 00:24:43,070 of your comment. 520 00:24:43,070 --> 00:24:45,710 Again, we will then ask individual participants 521 00:24:45,710 --> 00:24:49,880 to unmute, and at that time when you're spotlighted, 522 00:24:49,880 --> 00:24:51,680 you will be able to unmute. 523 00:24:51,680 --> 00:24:54,140 Because that function is not currently active 524 00:24:54,140 --> 00:24:54,980 across the board. 525 00:24:54,980 --> 00:24:58,070 But once you are spotlighted, you will have that ability. 526 00:24:58,070 --> 00:25:02,030 And then we will ask you to then share your thoughts out loud, 527 00:25:02,030 --> 00:25:04,880 asking you to limit your time to one or two minutes, just 528 00:25:04,880 --> 00:25:07,340 to allow us, again to hear from as many people 529 00:25:07,340 --> 00:25:11,540 as we can during this hour session. 530 00:25:11,540 --> 00:25:13,885 Again, if you prefer to comment anonymously, 531 00:25:13,885 --> 00:25:15,260 please note that in your comment. 532 00:25:15,260 --> 00:25:17,270 One of the facilitators will read it out 533 00:25:17,270 --> 00:25:20,960 loud without attribution. 534 00:25:20,960 --> 00:25:27,200 So with that, I believe I'm going turn it over to Judith 535 00:25:27,200 --> 00:25:32,300 first to go over the first comment. 536 00:25:32,300 --> 00:25:34,490 JUDITH KIMBLE: OK Well, thanks. 537 00:25:34,490 --> 00:25:36,050 Now it's my turn. 538 00:25:36,050 --> 00:25:38,450 And I'd like to welcome Beth. 539 00:25:38,450 --> 00:25:43,370 I think it's Cimini, who put in a comment 540 00:25:43,370 --> 00:25:49,280 on the value of postdoctoral training to academia. 541 00:25:49,280 --> 00:25:52,940 And I wonder if Beth could unmute, and tell us 542 00:25:52,940 --> 00:25:55,933 about her comment please. 543 00:25:55,933 --> 00:25:56,600 BETH CIMINI: Hi. 544 00:25:56,600 --> 00:25:58,073 Can you hear me? 545 00:25:58,073 --> 00:25:58,990 JUDITH KIMBLE: We can. 546 00:26:03,100 --> 00:26:06,620 BETH CIMINI: So, my comment was related to-- 547 00:26:06,620 --> 00:26:09,830 and some of the panelists have already touched on this-- 548 00:26:09,830 --> 00:26:13,370 what postdocs will do afterward, and if they 549 00:26:13,370 --> 00:26:16,280 want to stay in academia, the creation of staff scientist 550 00:26:16,280 --> 00:26:19,800 or other sort of specialist roles for them. 551 00:26:19,800 --> 00:26:22,610 One thing I haven't heard much about, 552 00:26:22,610 --> 00:26:25,370 and again, it's not necessarily for the people on this panel, 553 00:26:25,370 --> 00:26:28,970 more for the whole NIH, is about having specific training 554 00:26:28,970 --> 00:26:31,160 programs for scientists specialist roles, things 555 00:26:31,160 --> 00:26:33,620 like bioinformatics, or working in a microscope core 556 00:26:33,620 --> 00:26:35,510 facility, or things like that. 557 00:26:35,510 --> 00:26:38,000 These training programs aren't common, but they do exist. 558 00:26:38,000 --> 00:26:40,340 And in general, they're very difficult to fund. 559 00:26:40,340 --> 00:26:42,260 So is this something that people would 560 00:26:42,260 --> 00:26:49,530 support having RFAs in order to do, essentially? 561 00:26:49,530 --> 00:26:53,680 JUDITH KIMBLE: So Tara, am I supposed to answer that, 562 00:26:53,680 --> 00:26:57,800 or should we just move on? 563 00:26:57,800 --> 00:26:59,390 What's the protocol here? 564 00:26:59,390 --> 00:27:01,130 TARA SCHWETZ: Well, again we're hoping 565 00:27:01,130 --> 00:27:04,100 not to-- we can provide some clarity, 566 00:27:04,100 --> 00:27:07,290 as appropriate for when there are clarifying questions. 567 00:27:07,290 --> 00:27:09,560 But we want to make sure that we're hearing 568 00:27:09,560 --> 00:27:11,400 from as many folks as possible. 569 00:27:11,400 --> 00:27:11,900 So-- 570 00:27:11,900 --> 00:27:13,275 JUDITH KIMBLE: So let me just say 571 00:27:13,275 --> 00:27:15,350 Beth I think that's a really great comment, 572 00:27:15,350 --> 00:27:18,470 and it's important. 573 00:27:18,470 --> 00:27:21,800 We think it's definitely within the things 574 00:27:21,800 --> 00:27:23,690 that we're trying to think about. 575 00:27:23,690 --> 00:27:25,650 And we appreciate your comments. 576 00:27:25,650 --> 00:27:26,482 Thank you. 577 00:27:26,482 --> 00:27:27,440 BETH CIMINI: Thank you. 578 00:27:32,730 --> 00:27:35,880 ADRIANA MORALES GOMEZ: I guess I will take over now. 579 00:27:35,880 --> 00:27:41,280 We would like to call Pallavi Eswara, if I'm pronouncing it 580 00:27:41,280 --> 00:27:42,877 correctly. 581 00:27:42,877 --> 00:27:43,960 PALLAVI ESWARA: Thank you. 582 00:27:43,960 --> 00:27:46,330 I got the opportunity to be unmuted now. 583 00:27:46,330 --> 00:27:47,440 Yeah, and it's Pallavi. 584 00:27:47,440 --> 00:27:48,070 Thank you. 585 00:27:48,070 --> 00:27:49,330 ADRIANA MORALES GOMEZ: OK. 586 00:27:49,330 --> 00:27:51,010 PALLAVI ESWARA: Yes. 587 00:27:51,010 --> 00:27:54,950 So for my short time that I have here, 588 00:27:54,950 --> 00:27:59,050 I wanted to talk about the importance of mentoring 589 00:27:59,050 --> 00:28:00,940 across the board for all postdocs, 590 00:28:00,940 --> 00:28:03,670 for international postdocs, domestic postdocs, 591 00:28:03,670 --> 00:28:08,230 who are not on training grants or any specific fellowship 592 00:28:08,230 --> 00:28:08,770 program. 593 00:28:08,770 --> 00:28:13,870 I see that as a huge lapse which leads to unaccountability. 594 00:28:13,870 --> 00:28:15,970 And we don't know where these postdocs go. 595 00:28:15,970 --> 00:28:18,880 So the other aspect that I wanted to talk about 596 00:28:18,880 --> 00:28:20,500 was around outcomes. 597 00:28:20,500 --> 00:28:23,230 How to track postdoc outcomes, and that it 598 00:28:23,230 --> 00:28:25,420 should be required of all institutions which 599 00:28:25,420 --> 00:28:29,830 are funded by federal grants to be tracking their postdocs. 600 00:28:29,830 --> 00:28:34,240 And also, that postdoc outcomes should become an integral part 601 00:28:34,240 --> 00:28:37,480 of faculty P&T dossier, and should be included 602 00:28:37,480 --> 00:28:38,980 on departmental websites. 603 00:28:38,980 --> 00:28:41,650 It seems like we sometimes skip who 604 00:28:41,650 --> 00:28:43,540 the postdocs in each department are. 605 00:28:43,540 --> 00:28:44,620 It seems like an option. 606 00:28:44,620 --> 00:28:45,670 Some departments do it. 607 00:28:45,670 --> 00:28:46,580 Some don't. 608 00:28:46,580 --> 00:28:48,100 So there is some variability. 609 00:28:48,100 --> 00:28:52,860 But if we can have some kind of requirements for all grants 610 00:28:52,860 --> 00:28:54,940 that fund postdocs, that they should 611 00:28:54,940 --> 00:28:57,640 track their postdoc outcomes, and also 612 00:28:57,640 --> 00:29:02,500 include the names and the outcomes of their postdocs 613 00:29:02,500 --> 00:29:03,250 on their websites. 614 00:29:03,250 --> 00:29:05,840 It would be very helpful. 615 00:29:05,840 --> 00:29:06,340 Thank you. 616 00:29:09,515 --> 00:29:10,890 ADRIANA MORALES GOMEZ: Thank you. 617 00:29:10,890 --> 00:29:13,050 Judith, I don't know if you want to take over now. 618 00:29:16,490 --> 00:29:19,360 JUDITH KIMBLE: So I think the next person we are going 619 00:29:19,360 --> 00:29:21,610 to call on is Carrie Leonard. 620 00:29:21,610 --> 00:29:24,625 It was comments about the parent postdoc issue. 621 00:29:32,170 --> 00:29:33,140 CARRIE LEONARD: OK. 622 00:29:33,140 --> 00:29:35,530 Can you hear me? 623 00:29:35,530 --> 00:29:36,030 Yes? 624 00:29:36,030 --> 00:29:36,990 OK. 625 00:29:36,990 --> 00:29:37,800 Thank you. 626 00:29:37,800 --> 00:29:38,430 Yes. 627 00:29:38,430 --> 00:29:42,420 My comment was about the parent postdoc issue. 628 00:29:42,420 --> 00:29:45,090 But to echo some of the points that were brought up 629 00:29:45,090 --> 00:29:47,550 by the panelists, I think it really 630 00:29:47,550 --> 00:29:53,610 applies to more groups that are underrepresented. 631 00:29:53,610 --> 00:29:56,100 And I'm not sure if it was said, but also we 632 00:29:56,100 --> 00:29:58,530 want to be thinking about people with disabilities, 633 00:29:58,530 --> 00:30:07,810 and not only for people with these added life burdens, 634 00:30:07,810 --> 00:30:10,510 but also things just happen. 635 00:30:10,510 --> 00:30:11,320 Life happens. 636 00:30:11,320 --> 00:30:14,270 And sometimes things take longer. 637 00:30:14,270 --> 00:30:18,310 And I think with the applications 638 00:30:18,310 --> 00:30:22,340 to the postdoc fellowships, the intention 639 00:30:22,340 --> 00:30:24,860 is good to try and put these limits on. 640 00:30:24,860 --> 00:30:29,570 Because I know that NIH wanted to not have forever postdocs. 641 00:30:29,570 --> 00:30:32,900 But like we said earlier, when you move into this space, 642 00:30:32,900 --> 00:30:36,080 like me, I'm a sixth year postdoc, 643 00:30:36,080 --> 00:30:38,600 it is really just a title change. 644 00:30:38,600 --> 00:30:41,690 There's not much that effectively comes with that. 645 00:30:41,690 --> 00:30:45,530 And now my funding opportunities are limited. 646 00:30:45,530 --> 00:30:48,140 And when you try to have a conversation with program 647 00:30:48,140 --> 00:30:52,460 officers about it, the answer is often understandably 648 00:30:52,460 --> 00:30:54,980 their hands are kind of tied by the policies. 649 00:30:54,980 --> 00:30:58,850 And so I think just accepting as a community 650 00:30:58,850 --> 00:31:01,730 that this transition from postdoc to independence 651 00:31:01,730 --> 00:31:03,350 is not what it used to be. 652 00:31:03,350 --> 00:31:05,270 And while the policies were put in place 653 00:31:05,270 --> 00:31:07,460 to try to drive it back to shorter postdocs, 654 00:31:07,460 --> 00:31:09,170 that's just not reality anymore. 655 00:31:09,170 --> 00:31:13,130 And it's for several reasons, having parents, 656 00:31:13,130 --> 00:31:16,130 having disabilities, illness, having other family 657 00:31:16,130 --> 00:31:18,020 obligations. 658 00:31:18,020 --> 00:31:19,700 And the fact that the policies are not 659 00:31:19,700 --> 00:31:22,520 consistent across institutes doesn't help either, 660 00:31:22,520 --> 00:31:26,852 because you may be used to one Institute's policies. 661 00:31:26,852 --> 00:31:28,310 And then go look elsewhere, and you 662 00:31:28,310 --> 00:31:30,230 find you've missed the mark. 663 00:31:30,230 --> 00:31:33,200 And now someone who was giving NRSAs 664 00:31:33,200 --> 00:31:35,090 up to three or four years, now you 665 00:31:35,090 --> 00:31:38,160 had to apply within the first year. 666 00:31:38,160 --> 00:31:39,840 That's very confusing. 667 00:31:39,840 --> 00:31:42,650 And when you're in this kind of transition 668 00:31:42,650 --> 00:31:44,810 that we're hearing so much about with these longer 669 00:31:44,810 --> 00:31:48,560 postdocs, then the universities when you're 670 00:31:48,560 --> 00:31:51,170 moving to this next stage, they can't commit 671 00:31:51,170 --> 00:31:52,730 to giving you a higher salary. 672 00:31:52,730 --> 00:31:55,070 Because it's going to depend on funding. 673 00:31:55,070 --> 00:31:57,588 And then you get this other pushback 674 00:31:57,588 --> 00:31:59,630 where, well, we can't say we're going to pay you, 675 00:31:59,630 --> 00:32:01,640 because NIH is going to check you. 676 00:32:01,640 --> 00:32:07,050 So there's this back and forth about it's nobody's fault, 677 00:32:07,050 --> 00:32:09,100 and it's somebody else's responsibility. 678 00:32:09,100 --> 00:32:11,190 And I think that clear communication 679 00:32:11,190 --> 00:32:14,460 and clear investment from both the NIH and institutions 680 00:32:14,460 --> 00:32:19,590 is needed about how to support people during this transition. 681 00:32:22,130 --> 00:32:22,630 Yeah. 682 00:32:26,770 --> 00:32:28,300 ADRIANA MORALES GOMEZ: Thank you. 683 00:32:28,300 --> 00:32:33,010 We're going to also now call on Aaron Reifler. 684 00:32:33,010 --> 00:32:35,780 Sorry for the mispronunciation, Reifler. 685 00:32:38,320 --> 00:32:41,335 If you can unmute and share your comments. 686 00:32:59,060 --> 00:32:59,600 Thank you. 687 00:32:59,600 --> 00:33:00,892 AARON REIFLER: Can you hear me? 688 00:33:00,892 --> 00:33:01,460 OK. 689 00:33:01,460 --> 00:33:05,680 I just wanted to say thank you again to everyone. 690 00:33:05,680 --> 00:33:10,190 I loved hearing from Beth and Pallavi and Carrie as well. 691 00:33:10,190 --> 00:33:13,280 I feel like most of my comments have already 692 00:33:13,280 --> 00:33:15,290 been stated in some ways. 693 00:33:15,290 --> 00:33:19,250 I had a few questions I put up. 694 00:33:19,250 --> 00:33:22,160 But they covered things like the budgets for research grants, 695 00:33:22,160 --> 00:33:25,620 how they do directly impact expectations and outcomes. 696 00:33:25,620 --> 00:33:30,350 And I think that instructions need to be clearer 697 00:33:30,350 --> 00:33:35,270 within those RFAs and when people write their proposals 698 00:33:35,270 --> 00:33:37,410 for how mentoring will happen. 699 00:33:37,410 --> 00:33:39,260 And I think that's already been touched on 700 00:33:39,260 --> 00:33:41,420 from the other comments. 701 00:33:41,420 --> 00:33:45,890 I am wondering about the status within the NIH regarding things 702 00:33:45,890 --> 00:33:48,320 like the proposals that Bruce mentioned, 703 00:33:48,320 --> 00:33:50,300 and others have mentioned, on how 704 00:33:50,300 --> 00:33:53,270 we can alleviate some of the restrictions 705 00:33:53,270 --> 00:33:58,520 on NRSA fellows to allow them to have benefits from their host 706 00:33:58,520 --> 00:34:00,380 institutions. 707 00:34:00,380 --> 00:34:04,910 And then lastly, I share some of the same concerns 708 00:34:04,910 --> 00:34:08,420 that others have raised for folks, especially 709 00:34:08,420 --> 00:34:11,210 those who are interested in staying in academia, 710 00:34:11,210 --> 00:34:14,330 on how they would be able to make transitions 711 00:34:14,330 --> 00:34:18,560 when they have difficulty finding tenure track positions, 712 00:34:18,560 --> 00:34:19,280 essentially. 713 00:34:19,280 --> 00:34:21,500 And as some have mentioned, there 714 00:34:21,500 --> 00:34:24,949 are some universities who have carved out 715 00:34:24,949 --> 00:34:31,940 roles as specialists, or as other research scientist 716 00:34:31,940 --> 00:34:34,350 positions that are not on tenure track, 717 00:34:34,350 --> 00:34:36,050 but exclusively in research. 718 00:34:36,050 --> 00:34:42,510 And I would like NIH to address that stage, or as 719 00:34:42,510 --> 00:34:46,159 a valid career path, and make sure 720 00:34:46,159 --> 00:34:50,449 that there is funding that's not either training 721 00:34:50,449 --> 00:34:54,545 or to fund faculty salary. 722 00:34:54,545 --> 00:34:59,750 I would like there to be more acknowledgment in the research 723 00:34:59,750 --> 00:35:05,060 community and in the funding agencies for those. 724 00:35:05,060 --> 00:35:08,930 What ends up happening as career postdocs, which 725 00:35:08,930 --> 00:35:13,130 I don't want to see happen, because I do 726 00:35:13,130 --> 00:35:14,960 think that there are individuals who 727 00:35:14,960 --> 00:35:18,380 are very happy being in the research 728 00:35:18,380 --> 00:35:22,850 space without being a PI or without being tenure track 729 00:35:22,850 --> 00:35:23,690 faculty. 730 00:35:23,690 --> 00:35:27,290 And that can be very productive. 731 00:35:27,290 --> 00:35:33,060 And I just want to make sure we support those tracks as well. 732 00:35:33,060 --> 00:35:33,592 Thank you. 733 00:35:33,592 --> 00:35:34,550 Thank you for the time. 734 00:35:39,270 --> 00:35:40,020 JUDITH KIMBLE: OK. 735 00:35:40,020 --> 00:35:42,730 So shall I go next? 736 00:35:42,730 --> 00:35:43,230 Yeah. 737 00:35:43,230 --> 00:35:47,820 So I actually am going to do two that can't 738 00:35:47,820 --> 00:35:49,330 come on and talk themselves. 739 00:35:49,330 --> 00:35:50,740 So one is an anonymous. 740 00:35:50,740 --> 00:35:52,260 And I think for anonymous comments, 741 00:35:52,260 --> 00:35:53,400 we're going to read them. 742 00:35:53,400 --> 00:35:56,260 And the other one said that they didn't have a microphone. 743 00:35:56,260 --> 00:35:57,510 So I'm going to read that too. 744 00:35:57,510 --> 00:35:59,250 So I'm going to do two. 745 00:35:59,250 --> 00:36:05,010 And the first one is from an anonymous person who says, 746 00:36:05,010 --> 00:36:09,830 can we stop saying that we are trainees, please? 747 00:36:09,830 --> 00:36:15,360 Have a bit of respect for highly qualified scientists 748 00:36:15,360 --> 00:36:18,300 that achieve the highest academic degree 749 00:36:18,300 --> 00:36:21,290 would be a first. 750 00:36:21,290 --> 00:36:22,940 So that's a comment. 751 00:36:22,940 --> 00:36:26,140 I think it's a great comment. 752 00:36:26,140 --> 00:36:29,440 I sort of feel in my lab, people start as trainees 753 00:36:29,440 --> 00:36:31,630 and then very quickly become-- 754 00:36:31,630 --> 00:36:34,000 but they do start out as highly qualified. 755 00:36:34,000 --> 00:36:35,000 You're absolutely right. 756 00:36:35,000 --> 00:36:37,510 And I think that this is an ambiguity 757 00:36:37,510 --> 00:36:40,750 that we need to think about. 758 00:36:40,750 --> 00:36:45,820 The second comment is from Abe [? Cukier ?] 759 00:36:45,820 --> 00:36:47,140 I think is his last name. 760 00:36:47,140 --> 00:36:47,770 I'm not sure. 761 00:36:47,770 --> 00:36:50,410 He says he doesn't have access to a mic. 762 00:36:50,410 --> 00:36:55,180 And his comment is as a PhD student, 763 00:36:55,180 --> 00:36:59,710 I am driven away from a postdoc due to the ambiguity 764 00:36:59,710 --> 00:37:03,460 of the structure or lack thereof. 765 00:37:03,460 --> 00:37:05,890 Although the hard work put in could 766 00:37:05,890 --> 00:37:08,860 be the same in industry versus a postdoc, 767 00:37:08,860 --> 00:37:11,380 in industry from the interviews I 768 00:37:11,380 --> 00:37:14,380 have had so far, it's structurally clear 769 00:37:14,380 --> 00:37:18,770 how the next 5 to 10 years will look like. 770 00:37:18,770 --> 00:37:21,850 And so the uncertainties associated with postdocs 771 00:37:21,850 --> 00:37:25,780 are too big of a burden compared to other opportunities. 772 00:37:25,780 --> 00:37:28,510 I think that's another really important comment. 773 00:37:28,510 --> 00:37:29,665 So thank you for that. 774 00:37:36,335 --> 00:37:37,710 ADRIANA MORALES GOMEZ: Thank you. 775 00:37:37,710 --> 00:37:42,300 And then I am going to call on Allyn Howlett, 776 00:37:42,300 --> 00:37:50,250 or A-L-L-Y-N Howlett, if you would like to unmute. 777 00:37:50,250 --> 00:37:52,005 ALLYN HOWLETT: I'm unmuted now, I believe. 778 00:37:52,005 --> 00:37:53,130 ADRIANA MORALES GOMEZ: Yes. 779 00:37:53,130 --> 00:37:55,500 Yes. 780 00:37:55,500 --> 00:37:59,640 ALLYN HOWLETT: Addressing some of the earlier comments, 781 00:37:59,640 --> 00:38:02,550 and I made my comment before I saw these. 782 00:38:02,550 --> 00:38:09,000 But most institutions are very hesitant to move postdocs 783 00:38:09,000 --> 00:38:15,030 into a faculty title position, even if it's not a tenure track 784 00:38:15,030 --> 00:38:16,290 faculty. 785 00:38:16,290 --> 00:38:19,710 By putting postdocs in these job titles 786 00:38:19,710 --> 00:38:24,120 that are staff type titles, it really 787 00:38:24,120 --> 00:38:26,460 restricts their ability to continue 788 00:38:26,460 --> 00:38:27,960 to look for jobs elsewhere. 789 00:38:27,960 --> 00:38:34,080 Because it looks as if they are just a senior postdoc, or not 790 00:38:34,080 --> 00:38:34,860 contributing. 791 00:38:34,860 --> 00:38:39,720 But in today's research translational 792 00:38:39,720 --> 00:38:41,790 and clinical environment, we have 793 00:38:41,790 --> 00:38:45,600 lots of opportunities for individuals 794 00:38:45,600 --> 00:38:50,950 to do team research that are not faculty level job titles. 795 00:38:50,950 --> 00:38:55,020 This is not just a problem for the postdocs looking for jobs. 796 00:38:55,020 --> 00:39:00,330 But it's also a program training grant problem. 797 00:39:00,330 --> 00:39:03,510 Because the review committees tend 798 00:39:03,510 --> 00:39:08,250 to think that if the postdoc has not gone on to a tenure track 799 00:39:08,250 --> 00:39:14,370 faculty position that they are not successful in the training 800 00:39:14,370 --> 00:39:17,745 that they received in their postdoc training grants. 801 00:39:25,565 --> 00:39:27,440 JUDITH KIMBLE: So thank you for that comment. 802 00:39:27,440 --> 00:39:32,310 And let's move onto the next one from Susanna Brantley, who's 803 00:39:32,310 --> 00:39:35,790 talking about how a postdoctoral position sets 804 00:39:35,790 --> 00:39:38,160 postdocs back from saving for their future. 805 00:39:38,160 --> 00:39:39,270 Susanna? 806 00:39:39,270 --> 00:39:41,010 Could you unmute yourself, please? 807 00:39:41,010 --> 00:39:42,120 SUSANNA BRANTLEY: Hi. 808 00:39:42,120 --> 00:39:44,430 Yeah, thank you. 809 00:39:44,430 --> 00:39:51,060 So I'm on the postdoc association at Duke University. 810 00:39:51,060 --> 00:39:52,920 And so this comment is personal. 811 00:39:52,920 --> 00:39:54,868 But also is a thing that we've heard 812 00:39:54,868 --> 00:39:56,160 a lot from a bunch of postdocs. 813 00:39:56,160 --> 00:40:01,090 I just wanted to mention that I was speaking for an issue 814 00:40:01,090 --> 00:40:03,790 that I've heard a lot of comments about. 815 00:40:03,790 --> 00:40:06,370 So basically the idea, and it touches 816 00:40:06,370 --> 00:40:08,530 on this idea that postdocs, especially 817 00:40:08,530 --> 00:40:10,540 those on NIH fellowships, are not 818 00:40:10,540 --> 00:40:14,020 considered employees based on ambiguous language 819 00:40:14,020 --> 00:40:15,640 from the NIH. 820 00:40:15,640 --> 00:40:18,640 And so that sets us back from saving 821 00:40:18,640 --> 00:40:20,950 for retirement and other benefits, 822 00:40:20,950 --> 00:40:24,370 for example, paying taxes on health care costs, 823 00:40:24,370 --> 00:40:26,750 and things like that. 824 00:40:26,750 --> 00:40:29,080 So this especially impacts postdocs 825 00:40:29,080 --> 00:40:31,540 whose families are unable to help financially 826 00:40:31,540 --> 00:40:34,983 support major life goals, such as buying a first house, 827 00:40:34,983 --> 00:40:36,650 saving for retirement, all those things. 828 00:40:36,650 --> 00:40:38,530 So it does seem to reinforce sort 829 00:40:38,530 --> 00:40:41,140 of a lack of generational wealth, which 830 00:40:41,140 --> 00:40:44,330 is an underrepresented group in my opinion. 831 00:40:44,330 --> 00:40:46,840 And so this compounds over the low salary that's 832 00:40:46,840 --> 00:40:50,860 been talked about in the long term, especially when peers 833 00:40:50,860 --> 00:40:54,010 that are entering other fields like biotech industry, 834 00:40:54,010 --> 00:40:57,050 they can start saving for their future. 835 00:40:57,050 --> 00:40:59,230 And I think also to touch on this idea 836 00:40:59,230 --> 00:41:04,300 of the anonymous comment that was just read, that what's 837 00:41:04,300 --> 00:41:05,890 the value of a postdoc. 838 00:41:05,890 --> 00:41:11,290 And how much value we bring by having these advanced degrees, 839 00:41:11,290 --> 00:41:16,240 and training, and passion for what we do, 840 00:41:16,240 --> 00:41:19,390 I think it kind of undermines our expertise and value 841 00:41:19,390 --> 00:41:22,360 when we're not employees, and don't get the benefits that 842 00:41:22,360 --> 00:41:24,220 come with being an employee. 843 00:41:24,220 --> 00:41:28,510 And so my solution to this is that the NIH 844 00:41:28,510 --> 00:41:31,060 should change its language to clarify to institutions 845 00:41:31,060 --> 00:41:32,935 that postdocs should be considered employees, 846 00:41:32,935 --> 00:41:35,980 and really encourage institutions or somehow require 847 00:41:35,980 --> 00:41:40,630 them to provide retirement benefits and health benefits, 848 00:41:40,630 --> 00:41:43,630 outside of your funding. 849 00:41:43,630 --> 00:41:44,930 Thanks so much for this forum. 850 00:41:44,930 --> 00:41:46,960 It's great. 851 00:41:46,960 --> 00:41:49,150 JUDITH KIMBLE: Thanks so much for that comment. 852 00:41:49,150 --> 00:41:51,027 Adriana, are you next or my next. 853 00:41:51,027 --> 00:41:52,360 ADRIANA MORALES GOMEZ: I'm next. 854 00:41:52,360 --> 00:41:54,295 Can we call on Holly Grith? 855 00:41:57,809 --> 00:41:59,100 Or [? Grithe? ?] 856 00:41:59,100 --> 00:42:00,230 JUDITH KIMBLE: Wright? 857 00:42:00,230 --> 00:42:00,935 Holly Wright. 858 00:42:00,935 --> 00:42:02,060 ADRIANA MORALES GOMEZ: Yes. 859 00:42:02,060 --> 00:42:02,650 Holly Wright. 860 00:42:02,650 --> 00:42:03,550 HOLLY WRIGHT: Oh, OK. 861 00:42:03,550 --> 00:42:04,435 Can you hear me now? 862 00:42:04,435 --> 00:42:05,560 ADRIANA MORALES GOMEZ: Yes. 863 00:42:05,560 --> 00:42:06,892 HOLLY WRIGHT: Great sorry I-- 864 00:42:09,670 --> 00:42:12,490 question or statement is that it actually 865 00:42:12,490 --> 00:42:17,010 follows the previous one very nicely I think. 866 00:42:17,010 --> 00:42:19,680 Tracking the outcomes for NIH funded trainees 867 00:42:19,680 --> 00:42:21,970 is absolutely essential. 868 00:42:21,970 --> 00:42:25,650 And I happen to be in research administration, 869 00:42:25,650 --> 00:42:27,510 where I manage NSRA grants. 870 00:42:27,510 --> 00:42:31,420 And we struggle with collecting that data. 871 00:42:31,420 --> 00:42:33,660 We struggle with reporting it accurately, 872 00:42:33,660 --> 00:42:36,360 because the taxonomy around employment 873 00:42:36,360 --> 00:42:39,270 is inconsistent across institutions. 874 00:42:39,270 --> 00:42:42,780 And NIH instructions regarding the language 875 00:42:42,780 --> 00:42:46,170 that we use to describe our pre-docs and postdocs 876 00:42:46,170 --> 00:42:52,950 and their careers following their training is vague. 877 00:42:52,950 --> 00:42:59,440 As the folks managing and saving that information in order 878 00:42:59,440 --> 00:43:03,580 to report it, so that it can be acted upon by the NIH, 879 00:43:03,580 --> 00:43:06,490 we need clear definitions and common taxonomies 880 00:43:06,490 --> 00:43:09,430 in order to ensure that we have clean and effective 881 00:43:09,430 --> 00:43:11,440 current data, so that we can track 882 00:43:11,440 --> 00:43:13,420 the effect of NIH training programs 883 00:43:13,420 --> 00:43:15,670 as those changes are implemented. 884 00:43:15,670 --> 00:43:17,650 At this point in time, it seems to me 885 00:43:17,650 --> 00:43:25,200 that if the NIH suddenly changed based on what postdocs need 886 00:43:25,200 --> 00:43:27,960 and want in order to be successful and move forward 887 00:43:27,960 --> 00:43:31,680 in academic careers, and the NIH changed things, 888 00:43:31,680 --> 00:43:35,272 we wouldn't be able to clearly explain whether or not 889 00:43:35,272 --> 00:43:36,480 those changes were effective. 890 00:43:36,480 --> 00:43:40,920 Because we just do not have common language around careers. 891 00:43:40,920 --> 00:43:43,315 That's it. 892 00:43:43,315 --> 00:43:44,190 JUDITH KIMBLE: Great. 893 00:43:44,190 --> 00:43:45,310 Thank you so much. 894 00:43:45,310 --> 00:43:51,270 And so I think we'd like to next call on Lisa Privette Vinnedge 895 00:43:51,270 --> 00:43:52,710 if I've said that correctly. 896 00:43:57,320 --> 00:43:59,090 LISA PRIVETTE VINNEDGE: Can you hear me? 897 00:43:59,090 --> 00:43:59,590 All right. 898 00:43:59,590 --> 00:44:01,758 Thank you for the opportunity. 899 00:44:01,758 --> 00:44:03,550 And you got the name pronunciation correct. 900 00:44:03,550 --> 00:44:04,300 So that's awesome. 901 00:44:04,300 --> 00:44:07,100 It doesn't happen often. 902 00:44:07,100 --> 00:44:09,160 So I'm a postdoc office director. 903 00:44:09,160 --> 00:44:11,290 I've been in this role for eight years. 904 00:44:11,290 --> 00:44:15,400 And something that really frustrates me, 905 00:44:15,400 --> 00:44:17,530 because all these ideas are great. 906 00:44:17,530 --> 00:44:20,620 But when I go to the institutional leadership 907 00:44:20,620 --> 00:44:24,510 and the senior faculty that are making the decisions, 908 00:44:24,510 --> 00:44:27,900 nothing happens because there's no incentive, I guess to say. 909 00:44:27,900 --> 00:44:35,310 So I think the NIH needs to lead a culture change, and a change 910 00:44:35,310 --> 00:44:41,100 in perspective that will trickle down to leaders of institutions 911 00:44:41,100 --> 00:44:43,800 through meaningful actions and updated reporting 912 00:44:43,800 --> 00:44:45,400 requirements to the NIH. 913 00:44:45,400 --> 00:44:50,280 So the current leaders perpetuate 914 00:44:50,280 --> 00:44:56,670 the antiquated culture of abuse, unreasonable expectations, 915 00:44:56,670 --> 00:45:03,270 vague outcomes, no tolerance for non-academic careers. 916 00:45:03,270 --> 00:45:07,620 And those leaders are running the institutions 917 00:45:07,620 --> 00:45:10,380 and there's not going to be a support for building 918 00:45:10,380 --> 00:45:15,150 infrastructures that build up post-docs 919 00:45:15,150 --> 00:45:18,990 and help them with their career advancement 920 00:45:18,990 --> 00:45:22,680 without being told by the NIH that they have to, 921 00:45:22,680 --> 00:45:28,020 without some expectation of reporting outcomes, 922 00:45:28,020 --> 00:45:33,630 tracking data, holding them accountable from just 923 00:45:33,630 --> 00:45:35,220 a purely financial perspective. 924 00:45:35,220 --> 00:45:39,060 The institutions will not do it unless the carrot of NIH 925 00:45:39,060 --> 00:45:43,660 funding is something that they're 926 00:45:43,660 --> 00:45:45,700 going to have to earn in order to get. 927 00:45:49,090 --> 00:45:50,253 JUDITH KIMBLE: Thank you. 928 00:45:50,253 --> 00:45:51,670 ADRIANA MORALES GOMEZ: We're going 929 00:45:51,670 --> 00:45:54,910 to call next on Riley DeBacker. 930 00:46:02,730 --> 00:46:03,930 RILEY DEBACKER: Thank you. 931 00:46:03,930 --> 00:46:07,380 My comment was centered around the fact returning 932 00:46:07,380 --> 00:46:11,460 to the discussion of salary, as was mentioned earlier. 933 00:46:11,460 --> 00:46:15,910 Salary is a major barrier to postdocs for a lot of people, 934 00:46:15,910 --> 00:46:21,000 myself included, especially like access to resources and support 935 00:46:21,000 --> 00:46:22,270 from family. 936 00:46:22,270 --> 00:46:26,880 And I think the NIH current postdoc 937 00:46:26,880 --> 00:46:29,760 system is rather notable in that there's no adjustment based 938 00:46:29,760 --> 00:46:33,030 on locality, while other federal systems like the VA, 939 00:46:33,030 --> 00:46:37,500 do have those adjustments, and make those more desirable. 940 00:46:37,500 --> 00:46:38,880 When I was looking for a postdoc, 941 00:46:38,880 --> 00:46:43,170 I stopped looking anytime I saw the NSRA 942 00:46:43,170 --> 00:46:45,300 salary, because I knew that wasn't 943 00:46:45,300 --> 00:46:47,500 practical for me and my family. 944 00:46:47,500 --> 00:46:49,470 And so I took a position with the VA, 945 00:46:49,470 --> 00:46:51,000 because I knew it would be adjusted, 946 00:46:51,000 --> 00:46:53,400 and I'd be paid a rate representing 947 00:46:53,400 --> 00:46:56,680 the fact that I have significant advanced training. 948 00:46:56,680 --> 00:46:59,760 And so I wonder, especially since these systems 949 00:46:59,760 --> 00:47:04,380 for locality adjustments already exist in other federal systems, 950 00:47:04,380 --> 00:47:10,020 if NIH is considering implementing those to help 951 00:47:10,020 --> 00:47:12,630 restore some equity to the system. 952 00:47:19,843 --> 00:47:21,510 JUDITH KIMBLE: Well, thank you for that. 953 00:47:21,510 --> 00:47:24,513 And so the next comment will be from Erica-- 954 00:47:24,513 --> 00:47:26,180 and this is a challenging one, Gobrogge. 955 00:47:31,168 --> 00:47:33,210 ERICA GOBROGGE: That was exactly right, actually. 956 00:47:33,210 --> 00:47:35,790 Thank you for the opportunity to comment. 957 00:47:35,790 --> 00:47:39,180 I actually wanted to expand on two things that were already 958 00:47:39,180 --> 00:47:41,163 mentioned that I strongly agree with. 959 00:47:41,163 --> 00:47:43,080 Several people have talked about opportunities 960 00:47:43,080 --> 00:47:46,020 for non-faculty researchers, so people who have PhDs, 961 00:47:46,020 --> 00:47:47,670 have done a postdoc, and would like 962 00:47:47,670 --> 00:47:50,370 to stay in the academic system, and specifically we 963 00:47:50,370 --> 00:47:53,460 would love to see an expansion of the R50 mechanism. 964 00:47:53,460 --> 00:47:55,860 We've had some former postdocs who 965 00:47:55,860 --> 00:47:58,320 have gone on to be on R50s, and that's benefited I think 966 00:47:58,320 --> 00:48:00,090 both them and our institutions. 967 00:48:00,090 --> 00:48:02,790 So that would be wonderful if NIH 968 00:48:02,790 --> 00:48:04,260 would consider expanding that. 969 00:48:04,260 --> 00:48:06,600 And then to echo, I think several people's comments 970 00:48:06,600 --> 00:48:08,130 about NRSAs. 971 00:48:08,130 --> 00:48:10,170 We have also really struggled with that. 972 00:48:10,170 --> 00:48:14,550 We have a new T32, and our institution 973 00:48:14,550 --> 00:48:16,267 has really struggled. 974 00:48:16,267 --> 00:48:17,100 We're a small place. 975 00:48:17,100 --> 00:48:18,490 We only have 65 postdocs. 976 00:48:18,490 --> 00:48:20,895 So we can't take many of the options 977 00:48:20,895 --> 00:48:23,520 that other institutions have to put their postdocs on a totally 978 00:48:23,520 --> 00:48:24,570 separate benefit plan. 979 00:48:24,570 --> 00:48:26,760 So I would really love to see clarification that we 980 00:48:26,760 --> 00:48:27,960 can employ those postdocs. 981 00:48:27,960 --> 00:48:30,270 It's harming them right now. 982 00:48:30,270 --> 00:48:33,630 And I would love to see that we can have clear language that we 983 00:48:33,630 --> 00:48:34,450 can employ them. 984 00:48:34,450 --> 00:48:38,000 So thank you for the opportunity to comment. 985 00:48:38,000 --> 00:48:39,950 ADRIANA MORALES GOMEZ: Thank you. 986 00:48:39,950 --> 00:48:46,430 I'm going to follow up with a reading an anonymous comment. 987 00:48:46,430 --> 00:48:49,910 And it says, I think the academic system is not 988 00:48:49,910 --> 00:48:50,850 feasible. 989 00:48:50,850 --> 00:48:53,340 There's so much stress at every level. 990 00:48:53,340 --> 00:48:56,570 Postdocs are stressed because of uncertain career. 991 00:48:56,570 --> 00:49:00,980 I also see new PIs struggling because they can't get R01. 992 00:49:00,980 --> 00:49:05,420 I wonder if we need a more realistic approach than an IDP 993 00:49:05,420 --> 00:49:09,950 to mentor, so postdocs can find other job opportunities 994 00:49:09,950 --> 00:49:15,140 instead of struggling to get academia job 995 00:49:15,140 --> 00:49:17,840 and then struggling to survive there. 996 00:49:17,840 --> 00:49:21,980 Every year, explore the viability of academic job, 997 00:49:21,980 --> 00:49:24,540 and whether or not it is worth it. 998 00:49:24,540 --> 00:49:28,430 Maybe fewer postdocs and PIs would be better for everyone, 999 00:49:28,430 --> 00:49:31,190 if we can't change the financial situation 1000 00:49:31,190 --> 00:49:34,760 and support people we get into academia. 1001 00:49:34,760 --> 00:49:37,670 I feel like I was drowning the whole time, 1002 00:49:37,670 --> 00:49:40,550 trying to make it to academic position. 1003 00:49:40,550 --> 00:49:44,870 I'm settling for a non-academic scientist position for now 1004 00:49:44,870 --> 00:49:46,625 to continue enjoying science. 1005 00:49:49,400 --> 00:49:51,800 JUDITH KIMBLE: So, I'm going to follow 1006 00:49:51,800 --> 00:49:54,920 that one with another anonymous attendee that I'll read. 1007 00:49:54,920 --> 00:49:58,490 It says, it appears that the only grant that 1008 00:49:58,490 --> 00:50:00,740 can be considered a path to independence 1009 00:50:00,740 --> 00:50:04,910 for international postdocs is the K99 grant. 1010 00:50:04,910 --> 00:50:07,580 But that comes with a timeline, to apply 1011 00:50:07,580 --> 00:50:11,150 within three to four years transition, 1012 00:50:11,150 --> 00:50:14,030 and preferably requires a first author paper. 1013 00:50:14,030 --> 00:50:16,610 This timeline sounds reasonable. 1014 00:50:16,610 --> 00:50:18,860 But in reality, postdocs, especially working 1015 00:50:18,860 --> 00:50:22,230 with mouse models, need much longer time to get a paper. 1016 00:50:22,230 --> 00:50:25,160 So my point is more number of grants 1017 00:50:25,160 --> 00:50:28,970 for both international/everyone, which 1018 00:50:28,970 --> 00:50:32,360 will facilitate transition to independent faculty 1019 00:50:32,360 --> 00:50:34,950 position, so more K99s. 1020 00:50:39,390 --> 00:50:41,745 OK, Adriana? 1021 00:50:41,745 --> 00:50:42,870 ADRIANA MORALES GOMEZ: Yes. 1022 00:50:42,870 --> 00:50:45,500 We're going to call now on Tara Fischer. 1023 00:50:50,142 --> 00:50:50,850 TARA FISCHER: Hi. 1024 00:50:50,850 --> 00:50:51,000 Yeah. 1025 00:50:51,000 --> 00:50:51,240 Thank you. 1026 00:50:51,240 --> 00:50:52,150 Can you hear me OK? 1027 00:50:52,150 --> 00:50:52,560 ADRIANA MORALES GOMEZ: Yes. 1028 00:50:52,560 --> 00:50:53,305 TARA FISCHER: OK. 1029 00:50:53,305 --> 00:50:54,930 Yeah, thank you so much for this forum. 1030 00:50:54,930 --> 00:50:57,720 And I just I have to say just briefly, 1031 00:50:57,720 --> 00:51:01,140 I echo what everybody has said, especially those who 1032 00:51:01,140 --> 00:51:04,890 have called for more permanent positions in academic research, 1033 00:51:04,890 --> 00:51:07,410 or at least an alternative that people 1034 00:51:07,410 --> 00:51:12,270 who want to stay in academia can stay in another position other 1035 00:51:12,270 --> 00:51:13,540 than just PI. 1036 00:51:13,540 --> 00:51:17,010 So if that can be done, then that would just be excellent. 1037 00:51:17,010 --> 00:51:19,530 And I'm happy to hear other people who also think the same. 1038 00:51:19,530 --> 00:51:22,740 But I wanted to ask kind of a different question 1039 00:51:22,740 --> 00:51:25,140 than what has been discussed so far. 1040 00:51:25,140 --> 00:51:28,290 And this was on a point that was made on the expectations 1041 00:51:28,290 --> 00:51:30,813 for lengthening time to publish. 1042 00:51:30,813 --> 00:51:32,730 And a part of this lengthening time to publish 1043 00:51:32,730 --> 00:51:35,220 is the cultural value around CNS papers, 1044 00:51:35,220 --> 00:51:36,420 and these glam journals. 1045 00:51:36,420 --> 00:51:39,810 And this being considered in their research 1046 00:51:39,810 --> 00:51:42,780 evaluations for positions, promotions, and funding. 1047 00:51:42,780 --> 00:51:44,370 Now, we posting in these journals 1048 00:51:44,370 --> 00:51:46,020 requires enormous amounts of data 1049 00:51:46,020 --> 00:51:47,940 that are unreasonable to obtain in the time 1050 00:51:47,940 --> 00:51:50,130 limits of a postdoc, and are skewed 1051 00:51:50,130 --> 00:51:53,260 towards highly funded labs, and specific institutions, 1052 00:51:53,260 --> 00:51:55,470 particularly affecting underrepresented labs 1053 00:51:55,470 --> 00:51:56,790 and postdocs. 1054 00:51:56,790 --> 00:52:01,890 Will the NIH consider changing research evaluation procedures, 1055 00:52:01,890 --> 00:52:03,960 specifically for grants and other things that 1056 00:52:03,960 --> 00:52:07,140 are more in line to those expressed by DORA, 1057 00:52:07,140 --> 00:52:09,270 being focused on the quality of research, 1058 00:52:09,270 --> 00:52:11,520 not the journal in which they are published? 1059 00:52:11,520 --> 00:52:14,400 This could really make, I think, really great advances 1060 00:52:14,400 --> 00:52:17,220 in changing the culture around glam journals 1061 00:52:17,220 --> 00:52:19,770 and the expectations for postdocs to publish 1062 00:52:19,770 --> 00:52:21,300 in these particular journals. 1063 00:52:25,830 --> 00:52:29,370 JUDITH KIMBLE: OK, excellent. 1064 00:52:29,370 --> 00:52:33,450 I think the next one is also an anonymous attendee. 1065 00:52:33,450 --> 00:52:37,440 It says, many postdocs except from the awards 1066 00:52:37,440 --> 00:52:39,660 granted by NIH grants to PIs. 1067 00:52:43,360 --> 00:52:47,170 Many postdocs, except from the awards, are granted by-- 1068 00:52:47,170 --> 00:52:48,310 I don't know. 1069 00:52:48,310 --> 00:52:52,090 These PIs open postdoc positions in their labs, 1070 00:52:52,090 --> 00:52:55,720 but each position is filled following diverse recruitment 1071 00:52:55,720 --> 00:52:58,390 criteria that depends on the PI, the Department, 1072 00:52:58,390 --> 00:53:00,130 and the institution. 1073 00:53:00,130 --> 00:53:04,870 This creates a sort of black box where decisions are made with 1074 00:53:04,870 --> 00:53:09,070 variable degrees of success that we cannot anticipate. 1075 00:53:09,070 --> 00:53:13,180 Could a common application job search hub 1076 00:53:13,180 --> 00:53:16,060 be created to unify and democratize 1077 00:53:16,060 --> 00:53:19,930 the access to all positions, not only awards? 1078 00:53:19,930 --> 00:53:22,060 Maybe this could be achieved by creating 1079 00:53:22,060 --> 00:53:27,140 committees similar to review panels for grants. 1080 00:53:27,140 --> 00:53:30,230 It's an interesting idea. 1081 00:53:30,230 --> 00:53:31,775 OK, the next one, Adriana? 1082 00:53:31,775 --> 00:53:32,900 ADRIANA MORALES GOMEZ: Yep. 1083 00:53:32,900 --> 00:53:36,695 We're going to call on Maya, or Maja Bucan. 1084 00:53:43,077 --> 00:53:43,910 MAJA BUCAN: Perfect. 1085 00:53:43,910 --> 00:53:45,360 Can you hear me now? 1086 00:53:45,360 --> 00:53:46,730 ADRIANA MORALES GOMEZ: Yes. 1087 00:53:46,730 --> 00:53:49,550 MAJA BUCAN: I have a comment regarding the tracking 1088 00:53:49,550 --> 00:53:51,680 of postdoc outcome data. 1089 00:53:51,680 --> 00:53:53,780 This is in my view very important, 1090 00:53:53,780 --> 00:53:56,720 because we were often hear at conferences 1091 00:53:56,720 --> 00:53:58,760 that this data do not exist. 1092 00:53:58,760 --> 00:54:01,490 And we heard that today from a speaker. 1093 00:54:01,490 --> 00:54:04,490 But this is an issue from a speaker 1094 00:54:04,490 --> 00:54:08,720 and also from participants, postdocs, and administrators. 1095 00:54:08,720 --> 00:54:14,270 I would like to remind many that actually this data exists, 1096 00:54:14,270 --> 00:54:18,890 that effort is organized by Coalition for Life Sciences. 1097 00:54:18,890 --> 00:54:23,840 And unfortunately, data comes in such a form 1098 00:54:23,840 --> 00:54:26,210 that it's very hard to analyze it. 1099 00:54:26,210 --> 00:54:29,180 There are actually 50 institutions 1100 00:54:29,180 --> 00:54:31,940 that participate in coalition. 1101 00:54:31,940 --> 00:54:35,510 So in my view, it will be very important for NIH 1102 00:54:35,510 --> 00:54:39,620 working group to somehow facilitate coordination 1103 00:54:39,620 --> 00:54:45,320 of the effort to analyze data that we have for these outcomes 1104 00:54:45,320 --> 00:54:47,720 where our postdocs are, because there 1105 00:54:47,720 --> 00:54:52,500 is tremendous value in doing it not only in aggregate, 1106 00:54:52,500 --> 00:54:56,520 what coalition is giving. 1107 00:54:56,520 --> 00:55:00,230 But also it's very impressive to look at the data 1108 00:55:00,230 --> 00:55:02,240 at the level of different schools 1109 00:55:02,240 --> 00:55:03,890 or different departments. 1110 00:55:05,815 --> 00:55:07,190 ADRIANA MORALES GOMEZ: Thank you. 1111 00:55:09,740 --> 00:55:11,090 JUDITH KIMBLE: OK. 1112 00:55:11,090 --> 00:55:13,940 I've been told that we only have five minutes left, 1113 00:55:13,940 --> 00:55:16,400 and we're going to have one more comment which 1114 00:55:16,400 --> 00:55:18,680 will be an anonymous comment. 1115 00:55:18,680 --> 00:55:22,460 And my apologies to those of you who didn't manage to get 1116 00:55:22,460 --> 00:55:23,960 called on. 1117 00:55:23,960 --> 00:55:29,870 So the comment is, there needs to be a K99 R00 award, 1118 00:55:29,870 --> 00:55:35,750 but for a transition from postdoc to staff scientist. 1119 00:55:35,750 --> 00:55:38,870 In general, the K award year limits, four to five years, 1120 00:55:38,870 --> 00:55:43,310 need to be extended, as these limitations just hurt postdocs 1121 00:55:43,310 --> 00:55:47,060 rather than keep institutions and mentors supervising 1122 00:55:47,060 --> 00:55:48,860 the postdocs accountable. 1123 00:55:48,860 --> 00:55:51,740 While these limits were made with good intentions, 1124 00:55:51,740 --> 00:55:55,880 they haven't kept up with the times required for publication, 1125 00:55:55,880 --> 00:55:59,480 and have just caused workarounds and loopholes, i.e. 1126 00:55:59,480 --> 00:56:00,440 or e.g. 1127 00:56:00,440 --> 00:56:04,260 title changes, but nothing else. 1128 00:56:04,260 --> 00:56:07,040 And so I think that that's going to be the last one. 1129 00:56:07,040 --> 00:56:11,255 And I'll turn it back to Shelley and Tara. 1130 00:56:17,910 --> 00:56:19,410 TARA SCHWETZ: Thanks so much Judith. 1131 00:56:19,410 --> 00:56:21,340 And thanks to both of you and Adriana 1132 00:56:21,340 --> 00:56:25,560 for facilitating that session. 1133 00:56:25,560 --> 00:56:30,810 We have had a tremendous number of comments and questions come 1134 00:56:30,810 --> 00:56:35,700 through the chat, I think pushing upwards near 150. 1135 00:56:35,700 --> 00:56:40,150 Obviously, we didn't have time to get to all of those today. 1136 00:56:40,150 --> 00:56:42,120 And so we are collecting them. 1137 00:56:42,120 --> 00:56:44,040 And we'll go through them, and make sure 1138 00:56:44,040 --> 00:56:48,900 that they are considered and discussed by the working group. 1139 00:56:48,900 --> 00:56:52,020 But I just want to thank you all again 1140 00:56:52,020 --> 00:56:54,630 for your interest in the topics, and really 1141 00:56:54,630 --> 00:56:56,850 grateful for everyone who provided 1142 00:56:56,850 --> 00:56:59,040 input and your perspective shared today. 1143 00:56:59,040 --> 00:57:04,230 I think this has really provided a lot of confirmation 1144 00:57:04,230 --> 00:57:06,300 of some of the things that we were aware of, 1145 00:57:06,300 --> 00:57:10,200 or had heard through other mechanisms. 1146 00:57:10,200 --> 00:57:14,130 But also provided a lot of really good ideas 1147 00:57:14,130 --> 00:57:17,460 and highlighted things that maybe were not 1148 00:57:17,460 --> 00:57:21,090 so much at the top of our list, or we were aware of. 1149 00:57:21,090 --> 00:57:24,900 I also just want to point out one other thing that we 1150 00:57:24,900 --> 00:57:27,250 are recording today's session. 1151 00:57:27,250 --> 00:57:31,470 And so this session, as well as accessible materials, 1152 00:57:31,470 --> 00:57:36,540 will be posted to the working group website next week. 1153 00:57:36,540 --> 00:57:38,610 And also, there are multiple ways 1154 00:57:38,610 --> 00:57:40,030 that you can engage with us. 1155 00:57:40,030 --> 00:57:41,640 We have a request for information 1156 00:57:41,640 --> 00:57:44,550 that is open through April 14, and we 1157 00:57:44,550 --> 00:57:49,940 invite you to comment on these issues, and that as well. 1158 00:57:49,940 --> 00:57:54,430 Now we have our next listening session this Friday, March 10, 1159 00:57:54,430 --> 00:57:57,155 at 1:30 PM Eastern time. 1160 00:57:57,155 --> 00:57:59,530 It's going to be focused on international postdoc trainee 1161 00:57:59,530 --> 00:58:00,890 concerns. 1162 00:58:00,890 --> 00:58:04,060 We also have additional sessions on March 17 and 20 1163 00:58:04,060 --> 00:58:06,580 on compensation and benefits which obviously 1164 00:58:06,580 --> 00:58:08,920 came up quite a bit today, as well as 1165 00:58:08,920 --> 00:58:13,400 job security, satisfaction, and quality of life. 1166 00:58:13,400 --> 00:58:16,600 So we look forward to continuing to engage with the community 1167 00:58:16,600 --> 00:58:21,100 through these different sessions that we have, and the RFI. 1168 00:58:21,100 --> 00:58:24,605 And as help them to inform our development 1169 00:58:24,605 --> 00:58:26,230 of the recommendations that the working 1170 00:58:26,230 --> 00:58:28,520 group is going to be making. 1171 00:58:28,520 --> 00:58:30,995 So with that, Shelly, do you want to have the final word? 1172 00:58:30,995 --> 00:58:31,870 SHELLEY BERGER: Yeah. 1173 00:58:31,870 --> 00:58:33,440 I just want to thank everyone. 1174 00:58:33,440 --> 00:58:34,280 This was great. 1175 00:58:34,280 --> 00:58:36,250 It was quite a great attendance. 1176 00:58:36,250 --> 00:58:41,110 We had almost 500 people, and lots of great points, 1177 00:58:41,110 --> 00:58:42,190 as Tara points out. 1178 00:58:42,190 --> 00:58:46,000 And I also want to reiterate what she said. 1179 00:58:46,000 --> 00:58:47,170 So this will be posted. 1180 00:58:47,170 --> 00:58:50,830 Many people said they wanted to listen to the speakers again. 1181 00:58:50,830 --> 00:58:54,670 And so I want to thank the speakers for the great points 1182 00:58:54,670 --> 00:58:59,620 they made, and you can listen to them again at your leisure, 1183 00:58:59,620 --> 00:59:01,610 and listen to the great points. 1184 00:59:01,610 --> 00:59:04,500 So thank you all, everybody.