Conflict of Interest in Peer Review

Loading... Loading video...

Air date:	Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 12:00:00 PM Time displayed is Eastern Time, Washington DC Local
Views:	Total views: 96 * This only includes stats from October 2011 and forward.
Category:	Bioethics
Runtime:	00:57:35
Closed captioning:	Check box to display CC outside of the video Note: You can drag the captioning window around and resize it
Description:	NIH Clinical Center Ethics Grand Rounds What is the most common source of complaints, ethical concerns, and anger at the NIH? Many would answer: the peer review process. Rarely, however, do researchers get a chance to do anything about it. Now is your chance. Howard Young, NCI, will present a case raising questions about the ethics of peer review and how it might be improved. Catherine De Angelis, Editor of JAMA, will be the discussant.

NLM Title:	Peer review : when should you just say no? / Howard Young and Katherine D'Angelis.
Author:	Young, Howard A. National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
Publisher:
Abstract:	(CIT): NIH Clinical Center Ethics Grand Rounds What is the most common source of complaints, ethical concerns, and anger at the NIH? Many would answer: the peer review process. Rarely, however, do researchers get a chance to do anything about it. Now is your chance. Howard Young, NCI, will present a case raising questions about the ethics of peer review and how it might be improved. Catherine De Angelis, Editor of JAMA, will be the discussant.
Subjects:	Conflict of Interest Peer Review--ethics Plagiarism Scientific Misconduct--ethics
Publication Types:	Lecture Webcast
Rights:	This is a work of the United States Government. No copyright exists on this material. It may be disseminated freely.
NLM Classification:	W 21
NLM ID:	101267962
CIT Live ID:	1315
Permanent link:	https://videocast.nih.gov/watch=1315

NIH VideoCasting